Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhitlam, John B-
dc.contributor.authorLing, Ling-
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorMirochnik, Oksana-
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorChallis, Jackie-
dc.contributor.authorPetrovic, Vida-
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Damien L-
dc.contributor.authorMechinaud, Francoise-
dc.contributor.authorConyers, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorSlater, Howard-
dc.date2017-01-29-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T00:24:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-13T00:24:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Mematology 2017; 49: 39-47.e5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19319-
dc.description.abstractChimerism analysis has an important role in the management of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It informs response to disease relapse, graft rejection, and graft-versus-host disease. We have developed a method for chimerism analysis using ubiquitous copy number variation (CNV), which has the benefit of a "negative background" against which multiple independent informative markers are quantified using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction. A panel of up to 38 CNV markers with homozygous deletion frequencies of approximately 0.4-0.6 were used. Sensitivity, precision, reproducibility, and informativity were assessed. CNV chimerism results were compared against established fluorescence in situ hybridization, single nucleotide polymorphism, and short tandem repeat-based methods with excellent correlation. Using 30 ng of input DNA per well, the limit of detection was 0.05% chimerism and the limit of quantification was 0.5% chimerism. High informativity was seen with a median of four informative markers detectable per individual in 39 recipients and 43 donor genomes studied. The strength of this approach was exemplified in a multiple donor case involving four genomes (three related). The precision, sensitivity, and informativity of this approach recommend it for use in clinical practice.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleUse of ubiquitous, highly heterozygous copy number variants and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction to monitor chimerism after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleExperimental Mematologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCyto-Molecular Diagnostic Research Group, Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNephrology,en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationLaboratory Services, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPathology West Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationChildren's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.exphem.2017.01.004en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid28147232-
dc.type.austinComparative Study-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherWhitlam, John B
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptNephrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.