Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19157
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerraro, D-
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, D-
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, R L-
dc.contributor.authorZalcberg, J R-
dc.contributor.authorSjoquist, K M-
dc.contributor.authorTebbutt, Niall C-
dc.contributor.authorGrimison, P-
dc.contributor.authorMcLachlan, S-
dc.contributor.authorLipton, L L-
dc.contributor.authorVasey, P-
dc.contributor.authorGebski, V J-
dc.contributor.authorAiken, C-
dc.contributor.authorCronk, M-
dc.contributor.authorNg, S-
dc.contributor.authorKarapetis, C S-
dc.contributor.authorShannon, J-
dc.date2016-06-22-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T00:21:07Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-13T00:21:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2016; 78(2): 361-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19157-
dc.description.abstractThe phase II TACTIC trial prospectively selected patients with KRAS wild-type advanced biliary tract cancer for first-line treatment with panitumumab and combination chemotherapy. Of 78 patients screened, 85 % had KRAS wild-type tumours and 48 were enrolled. Participants received cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8 of each 21-day cycle and panitumumab 9 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or request to discontinue. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks (complete response, partial response, or stable disease). CBR of 70 % was considered to be of clinical interest. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, overall survival, CA19.9 response and safety. Thirty-four patients had a clinical benefit at 12 weeks, an actuarial rate of 80 % (95 % CI 65-89 %). 46 % had a complete or partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95 % CI 5.1-9.9) and median overall survival 11.9 months (95 % CI 7.4-15.8). Infection accounted for 27 % of the grade 3 or 4 toxicity, with rash (13 %), fatigue (13 %), and hypomagnesemia (10 %) among the more common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicities. A marker-driven approach to patient selection was feasible in advanced biliary tract cancer in an Australian population. The combination of panitumumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in KRAS wild-type cancers was generally well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy. Further exploration of anti-EGFR therapy in a more selected population is warranted.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectBiliary tract canceren_US
dc.subjectCancer antigen 19.9en_US
dc.subjectChemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectKRASen_US
dc.subjectPanitumumaben_US
dc.subjectPhase II trialen_US
dc.titleTACTIC: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of panitumumab, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in biliary tract cancer.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFlinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPrince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincents Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationHaematology and Oncology Clinics of Australasia, Wesley Medical Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNambour General Hospital, Nambour, QLD, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00280-016-3089-4en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid27335026-
dc.type.austinClinical Trial, Phase II-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinMulticenter Study-
local.name.researcherNg, Sweet Ping
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.