Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18955
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Nathan P-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorSengupta, Shomik-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-12T23:55:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-12T23:55:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.citationBJU International 2017; 119 Suppl 5: 10-18-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18955-
dc.description.abstractTo review the literature to identify factors affecting haematuria assessment in bladder cancer. We performed a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Publications indexed in EMBASE and Medline (PubMed) in March 2016 were searched, using the keywords 'hematuria', 'urinary bladder neoplasm(s)' and 'bladder tumor'. Studies evaluating the timeliness and adequacy of haematuria assessment in the context of bladder cancer were included. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, animal studies and non-English articles. Following our search strategy, a total of 17 articles were included in our study. All 17 studies commented on gender, with female gender associated with delayed and inadequate haematuria evaluation. Women waited longer than men for urological review (three studies) and bladder cancer diagnosis (three studies). Women were also less likely to be referred to urology (two studies), receive imaging (three studies) or have cystoscopy (two studies). In all, 10 studies commented on age, with the impression that advancing age is associated with a more thorough assessment. Smokers and those with microscopic haematuria appear to undergo a less thorough evaluation. Female gender is associated with sub-optimal haematuria evaluation, while older patients are evaluated more thoroughly. Smokers paradoxically undergo less comprehensive assessment. Further research on the impact of other factors is required.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectbladder cancer-
dc.subjectdiagnosis-
dc.subjecthaematuria-
dc.subjecttimeliness-
dc.subjecturinary bladder neoplasm-
dc.titleFactors affecting the timeliness and adequacy of haematuria assessment in bladder cancer: a systematic review.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU International-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.13821-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1138-6389-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3188-1803-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5145-6783-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3357-1216-
dc.identifier.pubmedid28544294-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptRadiology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Jan 31, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.