Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18757
Title: | Consistency of written post-operative patient information for common urological procedures. | Austin Authors: | Davies, Nicholas;Papa, Nathan P;Ischia, Joseph J ;Bolton, Damien M ;Lawrentschuk, Nathan | Affiliation: | Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Urology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia |
Issue Date: | Dec-2015 | Date: | 2015-04-19 | Publication information: | ANZ Journal of Surgery 2015; 85(12): 941-945 | Abstract: | Following urological procedures, it is common for patients to receive written handouts containing pertinent post-operative information and advice. This study aims to assess the consistency of procedure-specific post-operative advice provided to patients in Australia. Post-operative handouts for common urological procedures were obtained from a selection of Australian hospitals and practising urologists' websites. Handouts were examined for consistency with regard to post-operative advice and the Flesch-Kincaid grade level was calculated to determine readability. In total, 209 handouts were reviewed comprising seven urological procedures. The majority of handouts provided information regarding expected symptoms (88%) and when to seek medical attention (70.8%). Overall, 85.2% of handouts provided advice about which activities should and should not be performed. Instructions for return to work (32.1%), driving (45.5%), sex (32.1%) and physical activity (56%) were less universal. Infection, bleeding, pain and swelling were the principal reasons to seek medical attention. Duration of expected symptoms and timing for resuming normal activities were the most common sources of discordance between handouts. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 9.7 with a range of 6.7 to 13.6. Only 9.6% of patient information handouts had a grade level of 8 or less and no handouts were at or below the suggested grade 6 readability level. There is a significant degree of variability in written post-operative advice provided to patients in Australia. Individual surgeons and hospitals should provide specific and tailored advice directly to their own patients, written at a grade level suitable for the majority to understand. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18757 | DOI: | 10.1111/ans.13106 | ORCID: | 0000-0002-3188-1803 0000-0002-5145-6783 0000-0001-8553-5618 |
Journal: | ANZ Journal of Surgery | PubMed URL: | 25892214 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | comprehension medicolegal patient education handout post-operative care return to work |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.