Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18388
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHennessey, Derek B-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Gavin-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorKinnear, Ned J-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Yee K-
dc.date2017-12-21-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T05:58:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-30T05:58:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-
dc.identifier.citationBJU International 2018; 121 Suppl 3: 40-47-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18388-
dc.description.abstractTo describe our technique, illustrated with images and videos, of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for challenging renal tumours. A study of 249 patients who underwent RAPN in multiple institutions was performed. Patients were identified using prospective RAPN databases. Complex renal lesion were defined as those with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥10. Data were analysed and differences among groups examined. A total of 31 (12.4%) RAPNs were performed for complex renal tumours. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age was 57 (50.5-70.5) years and 21 patients (67.7%) were men. The median (IQR) American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2 (2-3). The median (IQR) operating time was 200 (50-265) min, warm ischaemia time was 23 (18.5-29) min, and estimated blood loss was 200 (50-265) mL. There were no intra-operative complications. Two patients (6.4%) had postoperative complications. One patient (3.2%) had a positive surgical margin. The median (IQR) length of stay was 3.5 (3-5) days and the median (IQR) follow-up was 12.5 (7-24) months. There were no recurrences. RAPN resulted in statistically significant changes in renal function 3 months after RAPN compared with preoperative renal function (P < 0.001). Our results showed that RAPN was a safe approach for selected patients with complex renal tumours and may facilitate tumour resection and renorrhaphy for challenging cases, offering a minimally invasive surgical option for patients who may otherwise require open surgery.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectRENAL score-
dc.subjectcomplex renal tumour-
dc.subjectnephron sparing surgery-
dc.subjectrobotic partial nephrectomy-
dc.titleStrategies for success: a multi-institutional study on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal lesions.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU International-
dc.identifier.affiliationEpworth Richmond Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEpworth Freemasons Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.14059-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8553-5618en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5145-6783en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7372-0100en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7833-2537en
dc.identifier.pubmedid29072806-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBolton, Damien M
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.