Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18379
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodwill, Alicia M-
dc.contributor.authorLum, Jarrad A G-
dc.contributor.authorHendy, Ashlee M-
dc.contributor.authorMuthalib, Makii-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Liam G-
dc.contributor.authorAlbein-Urios, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Wei-Peng-
dc.date2017-11-01-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T05:58:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-30T05:58:04Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports 2017; 7(1): 14840-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18379-
dc.description.abstractParkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24 rTMS and 9 TES studies (n = 33) with a sham control group were included for analyses. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Risk of Bias showed high quality (7.5/10) and low bias with included studies respectively. Our results showed an overall positive effect in favour of rTMS (SMD = 0.394, CI [0.106-0.683], p = 0.007) and TES (SMD = 0.611, CI [0.188-1.035], p = 0.005) compared with sham stimulation on motor function, with no significant differences detected between rTMS and TES (Q [1] = 0.69, p = 0.406). Neither rTMS nor TES improved cognition. No effects for stimulation parameters on motor or cognitive function were observed. To enhance the clinical utility of non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), individual prescription of stimulation parameters based upon symptomology and resting excitability state should be a priority of future research.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleUsing non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleScientific reports-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Health and Ageing (IHA), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Sports, Exercise and Healthy Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationSilverline Research Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4916-049X-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3929-9778-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29093455-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Jan 27, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.