Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18212
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuehland, Warren R-
dc.contributor.authorRochford, Peter D-
dc.contributor.authorTrinder, John-
dc.contributor.authorSpong, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorO'Donoghue, Fergal J-
dc.date2018-08-18-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-23T06:36:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-23T06:36:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-18-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 2019; 259: 93-103en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18212-
dc.description.abstractRespiratory related evoked potentials (RREP) were used to examine respiratory stimulus gating. RREPs produced by consciously detected vs. undetected loads, near the detection threshold, were compared. Participants (n = 17) were instrumented with EEG and a nasal mask connected to a loading manifold, which presented a range of mid-inspiratory resistive loads, plus a control, in a random block design. Participants were cued prior to the stimulus and signalled detection by a button press. There were statistically significant differences in peak-to-peak amplitude of the P1 RREP peak for detected (mean ± SD; 3.86 ± 1.45 µV; P =  0.020) and undetected loads (3.67 ± 1.27 µV; P =  0.002) vs. control (2.36 ± 0.81 µV), although baseline-to-peak differences were not significantly different. In contrast peak-to-peak P3 amplitude was significantly greater for detected (5.91 ± 1.54 µV; P <  0.001) but not undetected loads (3.33 ± 0.98 µV; P = 0.189) vs. control (3.69 ± 1.46 µV), with the same pattern observed for baseline-to-peak measurements. The P1 peak, thought to reflect arrival of somatosensory information, appeared to be present in response to both detected and undetected loads, but the later P3 peak, was present for detected loads only. This suggests that for sub-threshold loads sensory information may reach the cortex, arguing against a sub-cortical gating process.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAirway resistanceen_US
dc.subjectLoad detectionen_US
dc.subjectNegative airway pressureen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory related evoked potential (RREP)en_US
dc.subjectRespiratory sensationen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory stimulus gatingen_US
dc.titleEvidence against a subcortical gate preventing conscious detection of respiratory load stimuli.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMedicine (University of Melbourne)en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.005en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5099-3184en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9626-7460en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid30130628-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherO'Donoghue, Fergal J
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.