Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Elizabeth A-
dc.contributor.authorChesworth, Brigit M-
dc.contributor.authorConnell, Louise A-
dc.date2018-05-01-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-22T23:22:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-22T23:22:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationNeurorehabilitation and neural repair 2018; 32(9): 751-761-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18082-
dc.description.abstractDespite the exponential growth in the evidence base for stroke rehabilitation, there is still a paucity of knowledge about how to consistently and sustainably deliver evidence-based stroke rehabilitation therapies in clinical practice. This means that people with stroke will not consistently benefit from research breakthroughs, simply because clinicians do not always have the skills, authority, knowledge or resources to be able to translate the findings from a research trial and apply these in clinical practice. This "point of view" article by an interdisciplinary, international team illustrates the lack of available evidence to guide the translation of evidence to practice in rehabilitation, by presenting a comprehensive and systematic content analysis of articles that were published in 2016 in leading clinical stroke rehabilitation journals commonly read by clinicians. Our review confirms that only a small fraction (2.5%) of published stroke rehabilitation research in these journals evaluate the implementation of evidence-based interventions into health care practice. We argue that in order for stroke rehabilitation research to contribute to enhanced health and well-being of people with stroke, journals, funders, policy makers, researchers, clinicians, and professional associations alike need to actively support and promote (through funding, conducting, or disseminating) implementation and evaluation research.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectrehabilitation-
dc.subjectStroke-
dc.subjecttranslational medical research-
dc.titleImplementation-The Missing Link in the Research Translation Pipeline: Is It Any Wonder No One Ever Implements Evidence-Based Practice?-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Parkville, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1545968318777844-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8756-1051-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7936-5536-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0629-2919-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29848171-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.