Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17985
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChua, Chong Chyn-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hui Yin-
dc.contributor.authorTacey, Mark A-
dc.contributor.authorNandurkar, Harshal-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Prahlad W-
dc.date2017-05-24-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-02T03:58:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-02T03:58:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of haematology 2017; 99(1): 18-26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17985-
dc.description.abstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) provoked by transient risk factors has traditionally been classified as a single entity with lower risk of recurrence. We evaluated the association between different categories of transient provoking factors and the relative risk of recurrence. Retrospective evaluation of VTE events in non-cancer patients from July 2011 to December 2012 at two tertiary institutions in Australia with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. A total of 747 VTE cases were identified, and following exclusion of cases with mortality within 30 days of presentation (n=26), unprovoked cases (40.2%) had a higher risk of recurrence (4.6 vs 2.3/100 event-years, P=.01). Provoking factors included surgery (40.4%), injury (16.7%), medical-related factors including non-surgical hospitalisation or active infection (22.0%), travel (13.2%) and oestrogen related (6.5%). Air travel had the highest recurrence rate of 5.9/100 event-years, comparable to unprovoked VTE. VTE provoked by surgery showed lower recurrence rate at 1.8/100 event-years (P=.03). 62.5% of patients with provoked VTE recurred with an unprovoked event. Transient provoking factors for VTE are heterogeneous with varying potency and should not be considered a single entity. The high recurrence rate after travel-provoked VTE suggests that it is a "minor," if not negligible provoking factor with higher thrombotic predisposition.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectclot recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectepidemiological studiesen_US
dc.subjectprovoking factorsen_US
dc.subjecttravelen_US
dc.subjectvenous thromboembolismen_US
dc.titleRetrospective evaluation of venous thromboembolism: Are all transient provoking events the same?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean journal of haematologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNorthern Health, Epping, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejh.12884en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1373-7437en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2162-3288en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2455-3155en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1875-3927en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid28321922-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherChua, Chong Chyn
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Haematology-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.