Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17544
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScott, Rachel A-
dc.contributor.authorCallisaya, Michele L-
dc.contributor.authorDuque, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorEbeling, Peter R-
dc.contributor.authorScott, David-
dc.date2018-04-10-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T01:04:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-02T01:04:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationMaturitas 2018; 112: 78-84-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17544-
dc.description.abstractSarcopenia is an age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass and function that results in disability and loss of independence. It affects up to 30% of older adults. Exercise (particularly progressive resistance training) and nutrition are key strategies in preventing and reversing declines in muscle mass, strength and power during ageing, but many sarcopenic older adults fail to meet recommended levels of both physical activity and dietary nutrient intake. Assistive technology (AT) describes devices or systems used to maintain or improve physical functioning. These may help sarcopenic older adults to maintain independence, and also to achieve adequate physical activity and nutrition. There is a paucity of research exploring the use of AT in sarcopenic patients, but there is evidence that AT, including walking aids, may reduce functional decline in other populations with disability. Newer technologies, such as interactive and virtual reality games, as well as wearable devices and smartphone applications, smart homes, 3D printed foods, exoskeletons and robotics, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation also hold promise for improving engagement in physical activity and nutrition behaviours to prevent further functional declines. While AT may be beneficial for sarcopenic patients, clinicians should be aware of its potential limitations. In particular, there are high rates of patient abandonment of AT, which may be minimised by appropriate training and monitoring of use. Clinicians should preferentially prescribe AT devices which promote physical activity. Further research is required in sarcopenic populations to identify strategies for effective use of current and emerging AT devices.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAssistive technology-
dc.subjectDevice-
dc.subjectExercise-
dc.subjectFunctional decline-
dc.subjectNutrition-
dc.subjectSarcopenia-
dc.titleAssistive technologies to overcome sarcopenia in ageing.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleMaturitas-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), Department of Medicine - Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, St Albans, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.003-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29704921-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
local.name.researcherScott, Rachel A
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptOccupational Therapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.