Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17158
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFealy, Nigel G-
dc.contributor.authorAitken, Leanne-
dc.contributor.authordu Toit, Eugene-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Ian C-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T01:09:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-22T01:09:09Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation 2018; 20(1): 41-47-
dc.identifier.issn1441-2772-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17158-
dc.description.abstractTo determine if faster blood flow rate (BFR) has an effect on solute maintenance in continuous renal replacement therapy. Prospective randomised controlled trial. 24-bed, single centre, tertiary level intensive care unit. Critically ill adults requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Patients were randomised to receive one of two BFRs: 150 mL/min or 250 mL/min. Changes in urea and creatinine concentrations (percentage change from baseline) and delivered treatment for each 12-hour period were used to assess solute maintenance. 100 patients were randomised, with 96 completing the study (49 patients, 150 mL/min; 47 patients, 250 mL/min). There were a total of 854 12-hour periods (421 periods, 150 mL/min; 433 periods, 250 mL/ min). Mean hours of treatment per 12 hours was 6.3 hours (standard deviation [SD], 3.7) in the 150 mL/min group, and 6.7 hours (SD, 3.9) in the 250 mL/min group (P = 0.6). There was no difference between the two BFR groups for change in mean urea concentration (150 mL/min group, -0.06%; SD, 0.015; v 250 mL/min group, -0.07%; SD, 0.01; P = 0.42) or change in mean creatinine concentration (150 mL/min, -0.05%; SD, 0.01; v 250 mL/min, -0.08%; SD, 0.01; P = 0.18). Independent variables associated with a reduced percentage change in mean serum urea and creatinine concentrations were low haemoglobin levels (-0.01%; SD, 0.005; P = 0.002; and 0.01%; SD, 0.005; P = 0.006, respectively) and less hours treated (-0.023%; SD, 0.001; P = 0.000; and -0.02%; SD, 0.002; P = 0.001, respectively). No effect for bodyweight was found. Faster BFR did not affect solute control in patients receiving CRRT; however, differences in urea and creatinine concentrations were influenced by serum haemoglobin and hours of treatment.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleEvaluation of urea and creatinine change during continuous renal replacement therapy: effect of blood flow rate.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitation-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29458320-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29458320-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBaldwin, Ian C
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.