Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharles, Amanda-
dc.contributor.authorCross, Wendy-
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Debra-
dc.date2017-07-25-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T23:54:07Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-21T23:54:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2017; 51: 67-80en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16952-
dc.description.abstractSETTING: The study setting is a tertiary referral hospital of over 980 beds, in Victoria, Australia. The hospital is a long established major academic public health service providing healthcare, health professional education and health research. The hospital has 103,756 in-patient admissions, 190,756 outpatient attendances and over 82,000 presentations to the Emergency Department annually. PARTICIPANTS: 22 clinicians completed an in-depth, audio-recorded interview: 12 medical and 10 nursing staff, with a variety of clinical experience. INTERVENTION(S): Each audio recorded interview was transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. The semi structured questions were designed to explore the clinician's understanding of deaths that meet the criteria to be reported to Coroners Court of Victoria (CCOV), and why such reporting was required. There was also the opportunity to identify any barriers or enablers to the reporting process, whether internal or external to the organisation. RESULTS: Two main themes emerged from the interviews: 1. lack of awareness of which deaths are reportable to the coroner and 2. the need for educational support. Several subthemes were also identified such as accountability, the need for feedback and blame. DISCUSSION: The understanding of clinicians as to which deaths meet the reportable criteria in healthcare is quite variable and this indicates that there might be a level of under reporting. Apart from the potential of not meeting legal obligations, there may also be the loss of a valuable opportunity for lessons to inform clinical practice and enhance the delivery of safe patient care.en_US
dc.subjectCoroneren_US
dc.subjectDeath reviewen_US
dc.subjectPatient safetyen_US
dc.titleWhat do clinicians understand about deaths reportable to the Coroner?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Forensic and Legal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationQuality and Patient Safety, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing and Allied Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28763711en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.024en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.