Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16848
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLippmann, J-
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, C-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David McD-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, J-
dc.contributor.authorMohebbi, M-
dc.date2017-09-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-21T04:02:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-21T04:02:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.citationDiving and Hyperbaric Medicine 2017; 47(3): 144-154en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16848-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: A scuba diving fatality usually involves a series of related events culminating in death. Several studies have utilised a chain of events-type analysis (CEA) to isolate and better understand the accident sequence in order to facilitate the creation of relevant countermeasures. The aim of this research was to further develop and better define a process for performing a CEA to reduce potential subjectivity and increase consistency between analysts. METHODOLOGY: To develop more comprehensive and better-defined criteria, existing criteria were modified and a template was created and tested using a CEA. Modifications comprised addition of a category for pre-disposing factors, expansion of criteria for the triggers and disabling agents present during the incident, and more specific inclusion criteria to better encompass a dataset of 56 fatalities. Four investigators (raters) used both the previous criteria and this template, in randomly assigned order, to examine a sample of 13 scuba diver deaths. Individual results were scored against the group consensus for the CEA. Raters' agreement consistency was compared using the Index of Concordance and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: The template is presented. The index of concordance between the raters increased from 62% (194⁄312) using the previous criteria to 82% (257⁄312) with use of this template indicating a substantially higher inter-rater agreement when allocating criteria. The agreement in scoring with and without template use was also quantified by ICC which were generally graded as low, illustrating a substantial change in consistency of scoring before and after template use. CONCLUSION: The template for a CEA for a scuba diving fatality improves consistency of interpretation between users and may improve comparability of diving fatality reports.en_US
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.subjectDeathsen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectIncidentsen_US
dc.subjectInvestigationsen_US
dc.subjectScuba divingen_US
dc.titleChain of events analysis for a scuba diving fatalityen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleDiving and Hyperbaric Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDivers Alert Network Asia-Pacific, Ashburton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationBiostatistics Unit, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28868594en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherTaylor, David McD
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.