Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16481
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn M-
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, Aiko-
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Emilo Daniel Valenzuela-
dc.contributor.authorPeck, Leah-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorMårtensson, Johan-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Ling-
dc.contributor.authorGlassford, Neil J-
dc.contributor.authorHsiao, Yu-Feng Frank-
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Satoshi-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.date2015-10-21-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-06T02:37:02Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-06T02:37:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation 2016; 101: 108-114en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16481-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In mechanically ventilated (MV) cardiac arrest (CA) survivors admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) avoidance of hypoxia is considered crucial. However, avoidance of hyperoxia may also be important. A conservative approach to oxygen therapy may reduce exposure to both. METHODS: We evaluated the introduction of conservative oxygen therapy (target SpO2 88-92% using the lowest FiO2) during MV for resuscitated CA patients admitted to the ICU. RESULTS: We studied 912 arterial blood gas (ABG) datasets: 448 ABGs from 50 'conventional' and 464 ABGs from 50 'conservative' oxygen therapy patients. Compared to the conventional group, conservative group patients had significantly lower PaO2 values and FiO2 exposure (p<0.001, respectively); more received MV in a spontaneous ventilation mode (18% vs 2%; p=0.001) and more were exposed to a FiO2 of 0.21 (19 vs 0 patients, p=0.001). Additionally, according to mean PaO2, more conservative group patients were classified as normoxaemic (36 vs 16 patients, p<0.01) and fewer as hyperoxaemic (14 vs 33 patients, p<0.01). Finally, ICU length of stay was significantly shorter for conservative group patients (p=0.04). There was no difference in the proportion of survivors discharged from hospital with good neurological outcome (14/23 vs 12/22 patients, p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary support for the feasibility and physiological safety of conservative oxygen therapy in patients admitted to ICU for MV support after cardiac arrest (Trial registration, NCT01684124).en_US
dc.subjectOxygenen_US
dc.subjectCardiac arresten_US
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectOutcomeen_US
dc.subjectIntensive careen_US
dc.titleConservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients following cardiac arrest: a retrospective nested cohort studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleResuscitationen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationANZIC-RC, Monash University, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japanen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSection of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Swedenen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Nephrology, West China Medical School, West China Hospital, Chinaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26718090en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.026en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Aug 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.