Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16462
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Briana-
dc.contributor.authorChao, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorForoudi, Farshad-
dc.date2016-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-18T22:19:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-18T22:19:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences 2016; online first: 9 Septemberen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16462-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: When irradiating the left breast, a small portion of the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are often included in the treatment field. Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques reduce dose to coronary structures, but are resource intensive and may not be tolerated by all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simple multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modification technique with respect to target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing. METHODS: Forty nine patients with left-sided breast cancer, planned with a simultaneous integrated boost technique were retrospectively replanned with additional shielding of the LAD. Dose to the target volumes (whole breast and boost) and organs at risk (heart, ipsilateral lung and LAD) were assessed on both plans. RESULTS: Significant dose reductions were observed for all organs at risk when LAD shielding was introduced, with a reduction in mean LAD dose of 7.0 Gy, mean LAD planning risk volume (PRV) dose of 5.9 Gy, maximum LAD dose of 12 Gy and mean heart dose of 0.73 Gy. Target volume coverage was clinically acceptable for 96% of patients, using the left anterior descending coronary artery shielded plan (LADSP). No difference was observed between the standard plan (SP) and LADSP in nine patients (18%). CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients, the implementation of a simple MLC shielding technique can reduce the dose to cardiac structures, whilst maintaining breast and boost volume dosimetry. This technique is simple to implement and may be used as an alternative to DIBH for those patients who are unable to fulfill the selection criteria, or departments who are not resourced to perform DIBH.en_US
dc.subjectBreasten_US
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectCardiac toxicityen_US
dc.subjectOrgans at risken_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.titleReducing cardiac doses: a novel multi-leaf collimator modification technique to reduce left anterior descending coronary artery dose in patients with left-sided breast canceren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Medical Radiation Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiation Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27741387en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmrs.191en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherChao, Michael
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

96
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.