Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16461
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDalic, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorCook, Mark J-
dc.date2016-10-12-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-14T02:39:43Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-14T02:39:43Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-
dc.identifier.citationNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016; 12: 2605-2616en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16461-
dc.description.abstractDespite the development of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), ~20%-30% of people with epilepsy remain refractory to treatment and are said to have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This multifaceted condition comprises intractable seizures, neurobiochemical changes, cognitive decline, and psychosocial dysfunction. An ongoing challenge to both researchers and clinicians alike, DRE management is complicated by the heterogeneity among this patient group. The underlying mechanism of DRE is not completely understood. Many hypotheses exist, and relate to both the intrinsic characteristics of the particular epilepsy (associated syndrome/lesion, initial response to AED, and the number and type of seizures prior to diagnosis) and other pharmacological mechanisms of resistance. The four current hypotheses behind pharmacological resistance are the "transporter", "target", "network", and "intrinsic severity" hypotheses, and these are reviewed in this paper. Of equal challenge is managing patients with DRE, and this requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving physicians, surgeons, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, pharmacists, dietitians, and specialist nurses. Attention to comorbid psychiatric and other diseases is paramount, given the higher prevalence in this cohort and associated poorer health outcomes. Treatment options need to consider the economic burden to the patient and the likelihood of AED compliance and tolerability. Most importantly, higher mortality rates, due to comorbidities, suicide, and sudden death, emphasize the importance of seizure control in reducing this risk. Overall, resective surgery offers the best rates of seizure control. It is not an option for all patients, and there is often a significant delay in referring to epilepsy surgery centers. Optimization of AEDs, identification and treatment of comorbidities, patient education to promote adherence to treatment, and avoidance of triggers should be periodically performed until further insights regarding causative pathology can guide better therapies.en_US
dc.subjectDrug-resistant epilepsyen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectPharmacoresistanten_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.titleManaging drug-resistant epilepsy: challenges and solutionsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatmenten_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent’s Hospital, Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27789949en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/NDT.S84852en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

94
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.