Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoldsworth, Clare-
dc.contributor.authorHaines, Kimberley J-
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Jill J-
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Denise-
dc.contributor.authorSkinner, Elizabeth H-
dc.date2015-08-18-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-14T04:22:27Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-14T04:22:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Critical Care 2015; 30(6): 1243-1250en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16261-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Early mobilization in intensive care unit (ICU) is safe, feasible, and beneficial. However, mobilization frequently does not occur in practice. The study objective was to elicit attitudinal, normative, and control beliefs (barriers and enablers) toward the mobilization of ventilated patients, to inform development of targeted implementation interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 9-item elicitation questionnaire was administered electronically to a convenience sample of multidisciplinary staff in a tertiary ICU. A snowball recruitment approach was used to target a sample size of 20 to 25. Two investigators performed word count and thematic analyses independently. Themes were cross-checked by a third investigator. RESULTS: Twenty-two questionnaires were completed. Respondents wrote the most text about disadvantages. Positive attitudinal beliefs included better respiratory function, reduced functional decline, and reduced muscle wasting/weakness. The main negative attitudinal beliefs were that mobilization is perceived as time consuming and poses a risk of line dislodgement/disconnection. Positive control beliefs (enablers) included increased staff availability, positive staff attitudes, engagement, and teamwork. Negative control beliefs (barriers) included unstable patient physiology and negative workplace culture. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit staff expressed positive and negative attitudinal, normative, and control beliefs across the spectrum, and disadvantages were most frequently reported. Identified beliefs can be used to inform development of future interventions.en_US
dc.subjectMobilizationen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectImplementation scienceen_US
dc.subjectCritical illnessen_US
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen_US
dc.subjectTranslationen_US
dc.titleMobilization of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: An elicitation study using the theory of planned behavioren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Critical Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical Education Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, UKen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Menzies Health Institute QLD, Griffith University and Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAllied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, Cheltenham, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26365000en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.08.010en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherHaines, Kimberley J
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Education-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.