Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16221
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorParrott, Christine-
dc.contributor.authorWood, Gillian-
dc.contributor.authorBogatyreva, Ekaterina-
dc.contributor.authorCoombs, Geoffrey W-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Paul D R-
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Catherine M-
dc.date2016-06-06-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-11T04:27:27Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-11T04:27:27Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-06-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Microbiology 2016; 7: 802en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16221-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: We investigated the management of staphylococcal abscesses (boils) by general practitioners (GPs) in the context of rising antibiotic resistance in community strains of Staphylococcus aureus. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed patient-reported management of 66 cases of uncomplicated skin abscesses from the frequency matched methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) Community-Onset Staphylococcus aureus Household Cohort (COSAHC) study (Melbourne, Australia, 2008-2012). Susceptibilities in all cases were known: 50/66 abscesses were caused by MRSA. In order to investigate GP-reported management of staphylococcal abscesses, we surveyed a random subset of GPs, from the COSAHC study (41), and of GPs (39) who used the same community-based pathology service (December 2011-May 2012). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient outcomes, antibiotics prescribed, antibiotic resistance profiles of infecting strains, rates of incision and drainage (I&D), and attitudes to ordering microbiological cultures. RESULTS: MRSA was three times more likely to be cultured from an abscess than MSSA. Patient-reported management revealed 100% were prescribed antibiotics and only 60.6% had I&D. Of those 85% who remembered their prescription(s), 81% of MRSA cases and 23% of MSSA cases initially received inactive antibiotics. Repeat GP visits where antibiotics were changed occurred in 45 MRSA and 7 MSSA cases, although at least 33% of subsequent prescriptions were inactive for the MRSA infections. Patients treated with I&D and antibiotics did no better than those treated with only I&D, regardless of the antibiotic activity. In the GP surveys, 89% reported I&D, with or without antibiotics, to be their preferred management. Only 29.9% of GPs would routinely swab abscesses. CONCLUSION: The recommended management of uncomplicated Staphylococcus abscesses is I&D without antibiotics to reduce exposure to unnecessary antibiotics. In our study, I&D was performed in only 60.6% of 66 patients, and antibiotics were always prescribed. The prescribed antibiotics were frequently inactive and often changed, and did not appear to affect patient recovery. Our results show that community GPs can confidently reduce their use of antibiotics for patients with skin abscesses and should be aware that MRSA is a much more common in this type of infection.en_US
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureusen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectBoils and abscessesen_US
dc.subjectCommunity medicineen_US
dc.subjectSkin and soft tissue infectionsen_US
dc.titleA prescription for resistance: Management of staphylococcal skin abscesses by general practitioners in Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleFrontiers in Microbiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationYoung People’s Health Service, Department of Adolescent Medicine, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPerinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPathWest Laboratory Medicine – Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27375560en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2016.00802en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherJohnson, Paul D R
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Dec 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.