Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrayson, M Lindsay-
dc.contributor.authorMacesic, Nenad-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, G Khai-
dc.contributor.authorBond, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Jason-
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Gwendolyn L-
dc.contributor.authorGordon, David L-
dc.contributor.authorHellsten, Jane F-
dc.contributor.authorIredell, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorKeighley, Caitlin-
dc.contributor.authorStuart, Rhonda L-
dc.contributor.authorXuereb, Charles S-
dc.contributor.authorCruickshank, Marilyn-
dc.date2015-10-21-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-11T03:59:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-11T03:59:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-21-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One 2015; 10(10): e0140509en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16216-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Important culture-change initiatives (e.g. improving hand hygiene compliance) are frequently associated with variable uptake among different healthcare worker (HCW) categories. Inherent personality differences between these groups may explain change uptake and help improve future intervention design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used an innovative personality-profiling tool (ColourGrid®) to assess personality differences among standard HCW categories at five large Australian hospitals using two data sources (HCW participant surveys [PS] and generic institution-wide human resource [HR] data) to: a) compare the relative accuracy of these two sources; b) identify differences between HCW groups and c) use the observed profiles to guide design strategies to improve uptake of three clinically-important initiatives (improved hand hygiene, antimicrobial stewardship and isolation procedure adherence). RESULTS: Results from 34,243 HCWs (HR data) and 1045 survey participants (PS data) suggest that HCWs were different from the general population, displaying more individualism, lower power distance, less uncertainty avoidance and greater cynicism about advertising messages. HR and PS data were highly concordant in identifying differences between the three key HCW categories (doctors, nursing/allied-health, support services) and predicting appropriate implementation strategies. Among doctors, the data suggest that key messaging should differ between full-time vs part-time (visiting) senior medical officers (SMO, VMO) and junior hospital medical officers (HMO), with SMO messaging focused on evidence-based compliance, VMO initiatives emphasising structured mandatory controls and prestige loss for non-adherence, and for HMOs focusing on leadership opportunity and future career risk for non-adherence. DISCUSSION: Compared to current standardised approaches, targeted interventions based on personality differences between HCW categories should result in improved infection control-related culture-change uptake. Personality profiling based on HR data may represent a useful means of developing a national culture-change "blueprint" for HCW education.en_US
dc.subjectAttitude of health personnelen_US
dc.subjectGuideline adherenceen_US
dc.subjectHand disinfectionen_US
dc.subjectPersonality assessmenten_US
dc.titleUse of an innovative personality-mindset profiling tool to guide culture-change strategies among different healthcare worker groupsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePLoS Oneen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationHand Hygiene Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfection Prevention and Control Department, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Infectious Diseases & Microbiology, ICPMR Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMarie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, SA Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfection Control & Infectious Diseases Departments, Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationXAX Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMicrobiologyen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26489012en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0140509en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherGrayson, M Lindsay
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.