Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16158
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarrington, Melinda J-
dc.contributor.authorJennings, Garry L-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Mark R-
dc.contributor.authorSchlaich, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorStocks, Nigel P-
dc.contributor.authorBurrell, Louise Men
dc.contributor.authorAmerena, John-
dc.contributor.authorde Looze, Ferdinandus J-
dc.contributor.authorSwemmer, Carla H-
dc.contributor.authorKurstjens, Nicol P-
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Simon-
dc.date2015-06-18-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T23:59:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-25T23:59:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cardiology Nursing 2016; 15(6): 409-416en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16158-
dc.descriptionon behalf of the VIPER-BP Study investigatorsen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Blood pressure targets in individuals treated for hypertension in primary care remain difficult to attain. Aims: To assess the role of practice nurses in facilitating intensive and structured management to achieve ideal BP levels. Methods: We analysed outcome data from the Valsartan Intensified Primary carE Reduction of Blood Pressure Study. Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to the study intervention or usual care. Within both groups, a practice nurse mediated the management of blood pressure for 439 patients with endpoint blood pressure data (n=1492). Patient management was categorised as: standard usual care (n=348, 23.3%); practice nurse-mediated usual care (n=156, 10.5%); standard intervention (n=705, 47.3%) and practice nurse-mediated intervention (n=283, 19.0%). Blood pressure goal attainment at 26-week follow-up was then compared. Results: Mean age was 59.3±12.0 years and 62% were men. Baseline blood pressure was similar in practice nurse-mediated (usual care or intervention) and standard care management patients (150 ± 16/88 ± 11 vs. 150 ± 17/89 ± 11 mmHg, respectively). Practice nurse-mediated patients had a stricter blood pressure goal of ⩽125/75 mmHg (33.7% vs. 27.3%, p=0.026). Practice nurse-mediated intervention patients achieved the greatest blood pressure falls and the highest level of blood pressure goal attainment (39.2%) compared with standard intervention (35.0%), practice nurse-mediated usual care (32.1%) and standard usual care (25.3%; p<0.001). Practice nurse-mediated intervention patients were almost two-fold more likely to achieve their blood pressure goal compared with standard usual care patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 2.78; p=0.001). Conclusion: There is greater potential to achieve blood pressure targets in primary care with practice nurse-mediated hypertension management.en_US
dc.subjectNurse managementen_US
dc.subjectBlood pressureen_US
dc.subjectHypertensionen_US
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.titleImpact of nurse-mediated management on achieving blood pressure goal levels in primary care: Insights from the Valsartan Intensified Primary carE Reduction of Blood Pressure Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Cardiology Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationBaker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMenzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDiscipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Medicine and Cardiology, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationGeelong Cardiology Research Department, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNovartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26088568en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1474515115591901en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1863-7539en_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherBurrell, Louise M
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptGeneral Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.