Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDetering, Karen M-
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Scott A-
dc.contributor.authorWallis, Kasey-
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, William-
dc.contributor.authorMawren, Daveena-
dc.contributor.authorWhiteside, Kathryn-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T23:40:05Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T23:47:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T23:47:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T23:40:05Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2015; 5(8): e008800en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13777-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning (ACP) discussions in elderly Italian and Greek-speaking inpatients compared to English-speaking inpatients. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study with convenience sampling was conducted in Melbourne, Australia, and recruited hospital inpatients with medical decision-making capacity, aged 65 years or above, who spoke Greek (25 patients), Italian (24 patients) or English (63 patients). INTERVENTION: Facilitated ACP was offered, aiming to assists patients to consider and discuss their goals, values, beliefs and future treatment wishes with their family and doctor; to help them consider how they would like healthcare decisions made in the future if they become unable to do this for themselves; and to complete advance care directives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The completion of ACP discussions, their duration, advance care directive completion and utilisation of interpreters. RESULTS: Of 112 patients, 109 (97%) had at least one discussion, 63 (54%) completed advance care directives, either nominating a substitute decision-maker, documenting their wishes or both, and 76 (68%) included family in discussions. The median duration of discussions for all patients was slightly more than 1 h, over two visits. There were no differences between the Greek-speaking and the Italian-speaking patients, or between the Non-English speaking and the English-speaking patients in any of these measures. Only 14 non-English speaking patients, (30%) utilised interpreters, but when utilised, patients were much more likely (p<0.005) to complete advance care directives. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated ACP in elderly Italian and Greek-speaking patients is feasible, acceptable and is similar to that for English-speaking patients.en_US
dc.subjectAdvance Care Planningen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Continental Ancestry Groupen_US
dc.subjectFeasibility Studiesen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Centered Care*/methodsen_US
dc.titleFeasibility and acceptability of advance care planning in elderly Italian and Greek speaking patients as compared to English-speaking patients: an Australian cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRespecting Patient Choices Program, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26319775en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008800en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherDetering, Karen M
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.