Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDetering, Karen M-
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Scott A-
dc.contributor.authorWallis, Kasey-
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, William-
dc.contributor.authorMawren, Daveena-
dc.contributor.authorWhiteside, Kathryn-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T23:40:05Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T23:47:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T23:47:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-16T23:40:05Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2015; 5(8): e008800en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13777-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning (ACP) discussions in elderly Italian and Greek-speaking inpatients compared to English-speaking inpatients. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study with convenience sampling was conducted in Melbourne, Australia, and recruited hospital inpatients with medical decision-making capacity, aged 65 years or above, who spoke Greek (25 patients), Italian (24 patients) or English (63 patients). INTERVENTION: Facilitated ACP was offered, aiming to assists patients to consider and discuss their goals, values, beliefs and future treatment wishes with their family and doctor; to help them consider how they would like healthcare decisions made in the future if they become unable to do this for themselves; and to complete advance care directives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The completion of ACP discussions, their duration, advance care directive completion and utilisation of interpreters. RESULTS: Of 112 patients, 109 (97%) had at least one discussion, 63 (54%) completed advance care directives, either nominating a substitute decision-maker, documenting their wishes or both, and 76 (68%) included family in discussions. The median duration of discussions for all patients was slightly more than 1 h, over two visits. There were no differences between the Greek-speaking and the Italian-speaking patients, or between the Non-English speaking and the English-speaking patients in any of these measures. Only 14 non-English speaking patients, (30%) utilised interpreters, but when utilised, patients were much more likely (p<0.005) to complete advance care directives. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated ACP in elderly Italian and Greek-speaking patients is feasible, acceptable and is similar to that for English-speaking patients.en_US
dc.subjectAdvance Care Planningen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Continental Ancestry Groupen_US
dc.subjectFeasibility Studiesen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Centered Care*/methodsen_US
dc.titleFeasibility and acceptability of advance care planning in elderly Italian and Greek speaking patients as compared to English-speaking patients: an Australian cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRespecting Patient Choices Program, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26319775en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008800en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Jan 31, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.