Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13724
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToner, Liam-
dc.contributor.authorWeerakoon, Mahesha-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, A-
dc.contributor.authorKatelaris, N-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.date2015-10-19-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-22T03:27:45Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-22T03:28:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-22T03:28:01Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-22T03:27:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-03-
dc.identifier.citationProstate International 2015, vol. 3(4) p. 107-14en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13724-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an emerging technique aiming to improve upon the diagnostic sensitivity of prostate biopsy. Because of variance in interpretation and application of techniques, results may vary. There is likely a learning curve to establish consistent reporting of mpMRI. This study aims to review current literature supporting the diagnostic utility of mpMRI when compared with radical prostatectomy (RP) and template transperineal biopsy (TTPB) specimens. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed database searches were conducted identifying relevant literature related to comparison of mpMRI with RP or TTPB histology. RESULTS: Data suggest that compared with RP and TTPB specimens, the sensitivity of mpMRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection is 80-90% and the specificity for suspicious lesions is between 50% and 90%. CONCLUSIONS: mpMRI has an increasing role for PCa diagnosis, staging, and directing management toward improving patient outcomes. Its sensitivity and specificity when compared with RP and TTPB specimens are less than what some expect, possibly reflecting a learning curve for the technique of mpMRI.en_US
dc.subjectHistopathologyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectProstateen_US
dc.subjectProstatectomen_US
dc.subjectProstatic neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleMagnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: Comparative studies including radical prostatectomy specimens and template transperineal biopsyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleProstate Internationalen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Pathology, TissuPath Specialist Pathology Servicesen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialNarrative Reviewsen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26779455en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prnil.2015.09.006en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.