Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12666
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCross, G-
dc.contributor.authorBilgrami, I-
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn M-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Paul D R-
dc.contributor.authorHowden, Benjamin P-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl A-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T02:23:37Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T02:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and Intensive Care; 43(2): 193-8en_US
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12666en
dc.description.abstractIn a three-month retrospective study, we assessed the proportion of rapid response team (RRT) calls associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis. We also documented the site of infection (whether it was community- or hospital-acquired), antibiotic modifications after the call and in-hospital outcomes. Amongst 358 RRT calls, two or more SIRS criteria were present in 277 (77.4%). Amongst the 277 RRT calls with SIRS criteria, 159 (57.4%) fulfilled sepsis criteria in the 24 hours before and 12 hours after the call. There were 118 of 277 (42.6%) calls with SIRS criteria but no evidence of sepsis and 62 of 277 (22.3%) calls associated with both criteria for sepsis as well as an alternative cause for SIRS. Hence, 159 (44.4%) of all 358 RRT calls over the three-month study period fulfilled criteria for sepsis and in 97 (159-62) (27.1%) of the 358 calls, there were criteria for sepsis without other causes for SIRS criteria. The most common sites of infection were respiratory tract (86), abdominal cavity (38), urinary tract (26) and bloodstream (26). Infection was hospital-acquired in 91 (57.2%) and community-acquired in 67 (42.1%) cases, respectively. Patients were on antibiotics in 127 of 159 (79.9%) cases before the RRT call and antibiotics were added or modified in 76 of 159 (47.8%) cases after RRT review. The hospital length-of-stay of patients who received an RRT call associated with sepsis was longer than those who did not (16.0 [8.0 to 28.5] versus 10 days [6.0 to 18.0]; P=0.002).en_US
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherdeteriorating patienten
dc.subject.othermedical emergency teamen
dc.subject.otherrapid response teamen
dc.subject.othersepsisen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherAnti-Bacterial Agents.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherAustralia.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHospital Rapid Response Team.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherHospitals, Teaching.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLength of Stay.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherSepsis.drug therapy.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherSystemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.drug therapy.epidemiologyen
dc.titleThe epidemiology of sepsis during rapid response team reviews in a teaching hospital.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnaesthesia and Intensive Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Disease Unit, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Departments, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Intensive Care Unit Research, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.description.pages193-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25735684en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptMicrobiology-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.