Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12541
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, B Jen
dc.contributor.authorTai, A Yen
dc.contributor.authorKotsanas, Den
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, M Jen
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Aen
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Susan Aen
dc.contributor.authorJunckerstorff, R Ken
dc.contributor.authorKorman, Tony Men
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T02:15:05Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T02:15:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-17en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Microbiology 2014; 53(2): 626-35en
dc.identifier.govdoc25520446en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12541en
dc.description.abstractEggerthella lenta is an emerging pathogen that has been underrecognized due to historical difficulties with phenotypic identification. Until now, its pathogenicity, antimicrobial susceptibility profile, and optimal treatment have been poorly characterized. In this article, we report the largest cohort of patients with E. lenta bacteremia to date and describe in detail their clinical features, microbiologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. We identified 33 patients; the median age was 68 years, and there was no gender predominance. Twenty-seven patients (82%) had serious intra-abdominal pathology, often requiring a medical procedure. Of those who received antibiotics (28/33, 85%), the median duration of treatment was 21.5 days. Mortality from all causes was 6% at 7 days, 12% at 30 days, and 33% at 1 year. Of 26 isolates available for further testing, all were identified as E. lenta by both commercially available matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems, and none were found to harbor a vanA or vanB gene. Of 23 isolates which underwent susceptibility testing, all were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem, 91% were susceptible to clindamycin, 74% were susceptible to moxifloxacin, and 39% were susceptible to penicillin.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleClinical and microbiological characteristics of Eggerthella lenta bacteremia.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of clinical microbiologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Microbiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMicrobiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/JCM.02926-14en
dc.description.pages626-35en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25520446en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Feb 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.