Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElias, Albyen
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Michael Men
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Christopher Cen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:56:00Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Alzheimer's Disease : Jad; 42(3): 885-92en
dc.identifier.govdoc24961944en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12272en
dc.description.abstract2-[18F]fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may assist the diagnosis of dementia but it is an expensive investigation.To obtain management impact data for FDG-PET in dementia.This was a prospective study of 194 consecutive patients referred from a memory clinic for FDG-PET at the discretion of the dementia specialists. Diagnosis and management plans formulated at a multidisciplinary patient review meeting were compared before and after the release of PET findings.FDG-PET had moderate to high impact on the diagnosis and management in 85 (44%) participants. Diagnosis changed from probable neurodegenerative disease in 27 patients to a non-degenerative diagnosis and vice versa in 12 patients. PET changed the type of dementia in another 29 (15%) participants and prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors in 33 patients (17%). Number of uncertain diagnoses reduced from 58 to 35 (p < 0.001, χ2 = 15.12), differential diagnoses reduced from 127 to 55 (p = 0.003) and very probable diagnoses increased from 5 to 42 (p ≤ 0.001, χ2 = 1.01). Mini-Mental State Examination score was higher in those where PET had high diagnostic impact (26.3 ± 3.1 versus 23.9 ± 5.1, p ≤ 0.05). The degree of impact correlated with the pre-scan level of diagnostic uncertainty (ρ = -0.258, p < 0.001).The management impact was higher in those with greater diagnostic uncertainty and in those with less severe cognitive impairment. The findings suggest that FDG-PET is a useful adjunct for the management of suspected dementing disorders in appropriately selected patients.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAlzheimer's diseaseen
dc.subject.otherFDG-PETen
dc.subject.otherdiagnostic impacten
dc.subject.othermemory clinicen
dc.titleManagement impact of FDG-PET in dementia: results from a tertiary center memory clinic.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JADen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Aged Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/JAD-132729en
dc.description.pages885-92en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24961944en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherRowe, Christopher C
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptMolecular Imaging and Therapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.