Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12133
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, Williamen
dc.contributor.authorFullam, Rachael Sen
dc.contributor.authorParslow, Ruth Aen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Virginia Jen
dc.contributor.authorSjanta, Rebekahen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Lynneen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Vanessaen
dc.contributor.authorGilchrist, Janeen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:46:59Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:46:59Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-15en
dc.identifier.citationBmj Supportive & Palliative Care 2012; 3(3): 349-57en
dc.identifier.govdoc24644755en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12133en
dc.description.abstractTo assess existing advance care planning (ACP) practices in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) in Victoria, Australia before a systematic intervention; to assess RACF staff experience, understanding of and attitudes towards ACP.Surveys of participating organisations concerning ACP-related policies and procedures, review of existing ACP-related documentation, and pre-intervention survey of RACF staff covering their role, experiences and attitudes towards ACP-related procedures.19 selected RACFs in Victoria.12 aged care organisations (representing 19 RACFs) who provided existing ACP-related documentation for review, 12 RACFs who completed an organisational survey and 45 staff (from 19 RACFs) who completed a pre-intervention survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour.Findings suggested that some ACP-related practices were already occurring in RACFs; however, these activities were inconsistent and variable in quality. Six of the 12 responding RACFs had written policies and procedures for ACP; however, none of the ACP-related documents submitted covered all information required to meet ACP best practice. Surveyed staff had limited experience of ACP, and discrepancies between self reported comfort, and levels of knowledge and confidence to undertake ACP-related activities, indicated a need for training and ongoing organisational support.Surveyed organisations â policies and procedures related to ACP were limited and the quality of existing documentation was poor. RACF staff had relatively limited experience in developing advance care plans with facility residents, although attitudes were positive. A systematic approach to the implementation of ACP in residential aged care settings is required to ensure best practice is implemented and sustained.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otheradvance care planningen
dc.subject.otheradvance directiveen
dc.subject.otheraged care facilitiesen
dc.subject.otherhomes for the ageden
dc.subject.otherpalliative careen
dc.titleQuality of advance care planning policy and practice in residential aged care facilities in Australia.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ supportive & palliative careen
dc.identifier.affiliationRespecting Patient Choices, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000262en
dc.description.pages349-57en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24644755en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.