Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12010
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Carolen
dc.contributor.authorNeedham, Daleen
dc.contributor.authorHaines, Kimberley Jen
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael Jen
dc.contributor.authorWard, Alisonen
dc.contributor.authorHarrold, Meganen
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Paul Jen
dc.contributor.authorZanni, Jenniferen
dc.contributor.authorBuhr, Heidien
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Alisaen
dc.contributor.authorPresneill, Jeffen
dc.contributor.authorBerney, Susan Cen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:38:45Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:38:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-19en
dc.identifier.citationHeart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care 2013; 43(1): 19-24en
dc.identifier.govdoc24373338en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12010en
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this study were to develop a scale for measuring the highest level of mobility in adult ICU patients and to assess its feasibility and inter-rater reliability.Growing evidence supports the feasibility, safety and efficacy of early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there are no adequately validated tools to quickly, easily, and reliably describe the mobility milestones of adult patients in ICU. Identifying or developing such a tool is a priority for evaluating mobility and rehabilitation activities for research and clinical care purposes.This study was performed at two ICUs in Australia. Thirty ICU nursing, and physiotherapy staff assessed the feasibility of the 'ICU Mobility Scale' (IMS) using a 10-item questionnaire. The inter-rater reliability of the IMS was assessed by 2 junior physical therapists, 2 senior physical therapists, and 16 nursing staff in 100 consecutive medical, surgical or trauma ICU patients.An 11 point IMS scale was developed based on multidisciplinary input. Participating clinicians reported that the scale was clear, with 95% of respondents reporting that it took <1 min to complete. The junior and senior physical therapists showed the highest inter-rater reliability with a weighted Kappa (95% confidence interval) of 0.83 (0.76-0.90), while the senior physical therapists and nurses and the junior physical therapists and nurses had a weighted Kappa of 0.72 (0.61-0.83) and 0.69 (0.56-0.81) respectively.The IMS is a feasible tool with strong inter-rater reliability for measuring the maximum level of mobility of adult patients in the ICU.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherCritical careen
dc.subject.otherEarly mobilizationen
dc.subject.otherMechanical ventilationen
dc.subject.otherRehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherFeasibility Studiesen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subject.otherLocomotionen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherMobility Limitationen
dc.subject.otherObserver Variationen
dc.subject.otherPersonnel, Hospitalen
dc.subject.otherPhysical Therapistsen
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.titleFeasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleHeart & lung : the Journal of Critical Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationCurtin University, Perth, WA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand; Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003en
dc.description.pages19-24en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24373338en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBerney, Susan C
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Education-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

72
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.