Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11932
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Joe H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim Joon, Daryl | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sze Ting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hiew, Chee-Yan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Esler, Stephen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gong, Sylvia J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wada, Morikatsu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Clouston, David | - |
dc.contributor.author | O'Sullivan, Richard | - |
dc.contributor.author | Goh, Yin P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tochon-Danguy, Henri | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, J Gordon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bolton, Damien M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Andrew M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Khoo, Vincent | - |
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Ian D | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-16T01:33:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-16T01:33:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Radiology 2013; 24(3): 715-22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | PUBMED | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11932 | en |
dc.description.abstract | To evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy, diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (11)C-choline (CHOL) positron emission tomography (PET), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in predicting the prostatectomy Gleason risk (GR).The study included 21 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy and multi-technique imaging before radical prostatectomy. Values from five different tests (TRUS biopsy, DW MRI, CHOL PET, FDG PET, and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET) were correlated with the prostatectomy GR using Spearman's ρ. Tests that were found to have significant correlations were used to classify patients into GR groups.The following tests had significant correlations with prostatectomy GR: TRUS biopsy (ρ = 0.617, P = 0.003), DW MRI (ρ = -0.601, P = 0.004), and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET (ρ = -0.623, P = 0.003). CHOL PET alone and FDG PET only had weak correlations. The correct GR classification rates were 67% with TRUS biopsy, 67% with DW MRI, and 76% with combined DW MRI/CHOL PET.DW MRI and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET have significant correlations and high rates of correct classification of the prostatectomy GR, the strength and accuracy of which are comparable with TRUS biopsy.• Accurate determination of the Gleason score is essential for prostate cancer management. • DW MRI ± CHOL PET correlated significantly with prostatectomy Gleason score. • These correlations are similar to that between TRUS biopsy and prostatectomy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject.other | Adenocarcinoma.diagnosis.pathology.radionuclide imaging.surgery | en |
dc.subject.other | Aged | en |
dc.subject.other | Biopsy.methods | en |
dc.subject.other | Carbon Radioisotopes.diagnostic use | en |
dc.subject.other | Choline.diagnostic use | en |
dc.subject.other | Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.standards | en |
dc.subject.other | Fluorodeoxyglucose F18.diagnostic use | en |
dc.subject.other | Humans | en |
dc.subject.other | Male | en |
dc.subject.other | Middle Aged | en |
dc.subject.other | Neoplasm Grading | en |
dc.subject.other | Positron-Emission Tomography.standards | en |
dc.subject.other | Predictive Value of Tests | en |
dc.subject.other | Prospective Studies | en |
dc.subject.other | Prostatectomy | en |
dc.subject.other | Prostatic Neoplasms.diagnosis.pathology.radionuclide imaging.surgery | en |
dc.subject.other | Radiopharmaceuticals.diagnostic use | en |
dc.subject.other | Reproducibility of Results | en |
dc.subject.other | Sensitivity and Specificity | en |
dc.subject.other | Ultrasonography, Interventional | en |
dc.title | Diffusion-weighted MRI, 11C-choline PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for predicting the Gleason score in prostate carcinoma. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | European Radiology | en_US |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Radiation Oncology | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00330-013-3045-1 | en_US |
dc.description.pages | 715-22 | en |
dc.relation.url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24192979 | en |
dc.type.content | Text | en_US |
dc.type.austin | Journal Article | en |
local.name.researcher | Bolton, Damien M | |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Radiation Oncology | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Molecular Imaging and Therapy | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Radiation Oncology | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Molecular Imaging and Therapy | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Urology | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Molecular Imaging and Therapy | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
24192979.pdf | 64.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
58
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Download(s)
104
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.