Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11830
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Catherine Men
dc.contributor.authorGalea, Mary Pen
dc.contributor.authorLythgo, Noelen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:27:32Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:27:32Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-02en
dc.identifier.citationGait & Posture 2013; 39(1): 213-7en
dc.identifier.govdoc23916414en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11830en
dc.description.abstractWhile it is well established that obstacle crossing is impaired following stroke, it is not known whether obstacle crossing improves as gait improves following stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine whether obstacle crossing changed over a one month time period in people with a recent stroke. Twenty participants receiving rehabilitation following a recent stroke were tested on two occasions one month apart. Participants received usual care rehabilitation, including physiotherapy, between the tests. The main outcome measure was obstacle crossing speed as participants stepped over a 4-cm high obstacle. Secondary measures were spatiotemporal variables. Data were collected via a three dimensional motion analysis system. When leading with the affected limb no changes in obstacle crossing speed or spatiotemporal variables were observed over the one month period. When leading with the unaffected limb, crossing speed significantly increased (p=.002), and affected trail limb swing time (p=.03) and crossing step double support time reduced (p=.016). While not significant, the lead and trail limb pre-obstacle distance increased (p=.08), and lead swing time (p=.052) reduced. Change in obstacle crossing speed did not correlate with change in level gait speed. Obstacle crossing does not necessarily improve over a one month time period in people receiving rehabilitation following stroke. These findings suggest that there may be a need for more targeted training of obstacle crossing, particularly when leading with the affected limb.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherGait disorderen
dc.subject.otherNeurologicen
dc.subject.otherObstacle crossingen
dc.subject.otherRehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherStrokeen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherBiomechanical Phenomenaen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGait.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherGait Disorders, Neurologic.etiology.physiopathology.rehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLeg.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherStroke.complications.physiopathology.rehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherTask Performance and Analysisen
dc.subject.otherWalking.physiologyen
dc.titleObstacle crossing following stroke improves over one month when the unaffected limb leads, but not when the affected limb leads.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleGait & postureen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.008en
dc.description.pages213-7en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23916414en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherGalea, Mary P
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Spinal Cord Service-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

128
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.