Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNikfarjam, Mehrdad-
dc.contributor.authorWeinberg, Laurence-
dc.contributor.authorLow, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorFink, Michael A-
dc.contributor.authorMuralidharan, Vijayaragavan-
dc.contributor.authorHouli, Nezor-
dc.contributor.authorStarkey, Graham-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Robert M-
dc.contributor.authorChristophi, Christopher-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:15:55Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:15:55Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-10-
dc.identifier.citationJop : Journal of the Pancreas 2013; 14(1): 63-70en_US
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11648en
dc.description.abstractFactors affecting length of hospital stay after uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy have not been reported. We hypothesized that patients undergoing uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy treated by fast track recovery program would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared to those managed by a standard program.Patients without surgical or medical complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy managed by fast track or standard protocols, between 2005 and 2011, were identified and prognostic predictors for length of hospital stay determined.Forty-one patients treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy had no medical or surgical complications during this period. Of these patients, 20 underwent fast track recovery program compared to 21 who underwent standard care. Patients in the standard group were more likely to have a feeding jejunostomy tube (P<0.001), pylorus preserving procedure (P=0.001) and a nasogastric tube in place longer than 24 hours postoperatively (P<0.001). The median postoperative length of stay was shorter in the fast track recovery program group (8 days, range: 7-16 days) versus 14 days, range: 8-29 days; P<0.001). There were three readmissions in the fast track recovery program related to abdominal pain and none in the standard group. The overall length of stay, accounting for readmissions, still remained significantly shorter in the fast track recovery program group (median 9 days, range: 7-17 days versus median14 days, range: 8-29 days ; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge destination between groups. On multivariate analysis, the only factor independently associated with postoperative discharge by day 8 was fast track recovery program (OR: 37.1, 95% CI: 4.08-338; P<0.001).Fast track recovery program achieved significantly shorter length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdolescenten
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLength of Stay.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherMultivariate Analysisen
dc.subject.otherOutcome Assessment (Health Care).statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherPancreaticoduodenectomy.methodsen
dc.subject.otherPatient Discharge.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherPatient Readmission.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherPostoperative Care.methodsen
dc.subject.otherPostoperative Complications.prevention & controlen
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherYoung Adulten
dc.titleA fast track recovery program significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJOP : Journal of the Pancreasen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en_US
dc.description.pages63-70en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23306337en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherChristophi, Christopher
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Liver Transplant Unit-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Liver Transplant Unit-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Oct 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.