Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11513
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Catherine Men
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Meg Een
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Michael Men
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leoniden
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julieen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:07:36Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-08en
dc.identifier.citationBmc Geriatrics 2012; 12(): 26en
dc.identifier.govdoc22676723en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11513en
dc.description.abstractOlder adults receiving inpatient rehabilitation have low activity levels and poor mobility outcomes. Increased physical activity may improve mobility. The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of enhanced physical activity in older adults receiving rehabilitation.Patients admitted to aged care rehabilitation with reduced mobility were randomized to receive usual care or usual care plus additional physical activity, which was delivered by a physiotherapist or physiotherapy assistant. The feasibility and safety of the proposed RCT protocol was evaluated. The primary clinical outcome was mobility, which was assessed on hospital admission and discharge by an assessor blinded to group assignment. To determine the most appropriate measure of mobility, three measures were trialled; the Timed Up and Go, the Elderly Mobility Scale and the de Morton Mobility Index.The protocol was feasible. Thirty-four percent of people admitted to the ward were recruited, with 47 participants randomised to a control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 22). The rates of adverse events (death, falls and readmission to an acute service) did not differ between the groups. Usual care therapists remained blind to group allocation, with no change in usual practice. Physical activity targets were met on weekdays but not weekends and the intervention was acceptable to participants. The de Morton Mobility Index was the most appropriate measure of mobility.The proposed RCT of enhanced physical activity in older adults receiving rehabilitation was feasible. A larger multi-centre RCT to establish whether this intervention is cost effective and improves mobility is warranted.The trial was registered with the ANZTCR (ACTRN12608000427370).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherExercise Therapy.methodsen
dc.subject.otherFeasibility Studiesen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHospitalizationen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMobility Limitationen
dc.subject.otherMotor Activity.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherPilot Projectsen
dc.subject.otherRehabilitation Centersen
dc.subject.otherSingle-Blind Methoden
dc.titleEnhancing physical activity in older adults receiving hospital based rehabilitation: a phase II feasibility study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC geriatricsen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2318-12-26en
dc.description.pages26en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22676723en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherChurilov, Leonid
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22676723.pdf261.61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Download(s)

98
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.