Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11447
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCalzavacca, Paoloen
dc.contributor.authorLicari, Een
dc.contributor.authorTee, Aen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:03:30Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-19en
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation 2012; 83(9): 1119-23en
dc.identifier.govdoc22353639en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11447en
dc.description.abstractTo estimate the prognostic value of point-of-care measurement of biomarkers related to dyspnea in patients receiving a medical emergency team (MET) review.Prospective observational study.University affiliated hospital.Cohort of 95 patients receiving MET review over a six month period.We used a commercial multi-biomarker panel for shortness-of-breath (SOB panel) (Biosite Triage Profiler, Biosite Incorporated®), 9975 Summers Ridge Road, San Diego, CA 92121, USA) including Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), D-dimer, myoglobin (Myo), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) and troponin I (Tn-I). We recorded information about demographics, MET review triggers, and MET procedures and patient outcome.Mean age was 70.5 (±15) years, 38 (41%) patients had a history of chronic heart failure (CHF) and 67 (70%) chronic kidney disease (CKD). At MET activation, 42 (44%) patients were dyspneic. The multi-biomarker panel was positive for at least one marker in 48 (51%) cases. BNP and D-dimer had a sensitivity of 0.79 and 0.93 for ICU admission with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.89 and 0.92 respectively. Thirty-five (37%) patients died. BNP was positive in 85% of such cases with sensitivity and NPV of 0.86 and 0.82, respectively. D-dimer was positive in 77% of non-survivors with a sensitivity and NPV of 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. BNP (area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve--AUC-ROC: 0.638) and D-dimer (AUC-ROC: 0.574) achieved poor discrimination of subsequent death. Similar findings applied to ICU admission. The combination of normal BNP and D-dimer levels completely ruled out ICU admission or death. The cardiac part of the panel was not useful in predicting ICU admission or mortality.Although, BNP and D-dimer are poor discriminants of ICU admission and hospital mortality, normal BNP and D-dimer levels practically exclude subsequent need for ICU admission and hospital mortality.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherEmergency Service, Hospitalen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherPatient Care Teamen
dc.subject.otherPilot Projectsen
dc.subject.otherPoint-of-Care Systemsen
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.titlePoint-of-care testing during medical emergency team activations: a pilot study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleResuscitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.012en
dc.description.pages1119-23en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22353639en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.