Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11383
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReade, Michael Cen
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn Men
dc.contributor.authorPeck, Leahen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Ian Cen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:58:25Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation; 13(4): 217-24en
dc.identifier.govdoc22129282en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11383en
dc.description.abstractThe Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is emerging as the most frequently used tool for identifying delirium among critically ill patients.To determine whether the number of patients and nursing shifts in which delirium was diagnosed would increase after the introduction of the CAM-ICU in our unit.Before-and-after study. In a 30-day Phase 1, we asked bedside nurses to assess their ICU patients for delirium each shift. We then conducted intensive education on the CAM-ICU for 30 days, including lectures, bedside tutorials, and supervised practice. In Phase 2, for 30 days we asked bedside nurses to record the results of their CAM-ICU assessments.20-bed mixed medical and surgical ICU at the Austin Hospital, Melbourne.All patients admitted to the ICU during each phase.Diagnosis of delirium by bedside nurses using either the CAM-ICU or an unstructured clinical assessment, by patient and nursing shift.Compared with unstructured assessments, the CAM-ICU identified a significantly lower proportion of patients (36.7% v 21.3%; P = 0.004) and a significantly lower proportion of shifts (14.7% v 6.4% of shifts, P = 0.002) with delirium. When adjusted for differences in age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III risk of death and total length of stay between the two periods, assessment type remained a significant predictor of the diagnosis of delirium.In our hospital, the CAM-ICU detected delirium less often than unstructured delirium assessments made by qualified intensive care nurses.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherConfusionen
dc.subject.otherCritical Illness.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherDelirium.diagnosis.epidemiology.nursingen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subject.otherIntubation, Intratrachealen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMass Screening.methodsen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherNursing Assessment.methodsen
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.titleRoutine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) by bedside nurses may underdiagnose delirium.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationm.reade@uq.edu.auen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.pages217-24en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22129282en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBaldwin, Ian C
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.