Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11380
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorSwale, Mathew Jen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:58:14Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:58:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01en
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Opinion in Cardiology; 27(1): 29-35en
dc.identifier.govdoc22123606en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11380en
dc.description.abstractThe number of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapies (CRTs) is increasing at a substantial rate. The implant, however, is not always performed effectively and the complication rates are considerable. The training and accreditation to perform CRT need to be evaluated to optimize procedural and patient outcomes.The relationship between higher procedural volumes and reduced procedural complications is evident and consistent across a range of surgical specialties and procedures. Present guidelines recommend that training in CRT can be achieved with five to 25 cases. The limited studies in this area suggest that this is inadequate, with complication rates of CRT reducing significantly with procedural experience well beyond 100 cases.There is increasing evidence that the development of procedural skills is dependent not only on cognitive factors, but also on a number of intrinsic visuospatial factors and fine motor dexterity. These factors can be tested objectively and the validity of adopting these techniques for the selection and training of operators is being evaluated.Ongoing evaluation of the training requirements and accreditation is required to optimize the implantation of CRT.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAccreditationen
dc.subject.otherCardiac Resynchronization Therapy.standardsen
dc.subject.otherCardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devicesen
dc.subject.otherClinical Competenceen
dc.subject.otherGuidelines as Topicen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherInservice Trainingen
dc.subject.otherProsthesis Implantation.educationen
dc.subject.otherSpecialties, Surgical.educationen
dc.titleHow much training is required to implant and manage CRT?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCurrent opinion in cardiologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidleberg, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834dc490en
dc.description.pages29-35en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22123606en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherO'Donnell, David
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Feb 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.