Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChae, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David McDen
dc.contributor.authorFrauman, Albert Gen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:56:29Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-20en
dc.identifier.citationEmergency Medicine Australasia : EMA 2011; 23(5): 554-61en
dc.identifier.govdoc21995469en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11351en
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to compare the relative efficacy of tropisetron and metoclopramide in treating nausea/vomiting in undifferentiated ED patients.We undertook a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Adult patients requiring treatment for nausea/vomiting were randomly assigned to either tropisetron (5 mg) or metoclopramide (10 mg), by i.v. bolus. The primary end-point was incidence of vomiting. Secondary end-points were decrease in nausea score from baseline (0-100 VAS), the requirement of 'rescue' anti-emetics, ongoing nausea over 48 h and side-effects.Fifty patients were enrolled in each group. The demographic variables, presenting complaints and nausea scores at baseline did not differ (P > 0.05). By 180 min, two (4.0%) and nine (18.0%) patients had vomited in the tropisetron and metoclopramide groups respectively (difference 14.0%, 95% CI 0.1-28.0, P= 0.05). Also, there were two and 20 episodes of vomiting respectively. Vomiting rates were 0.02 and 0.16 episodes/person-hour (difference 0.14 episodes/person-hour, 95% CI 0.07-0.21, P < 0.001) respectively. By 60 min and thereafter, the decrease in nausea score from baseline was greater (although not significantly so) in the tropisetron group. At 180 min, the decreases were 47.9 mm and 37.0 mm respectively (difference 10.9 mm, 95% CI -0.7-22.6). Five (10.0%) and 13 (26.0%) patients required a rescue anti-emetic respectively (difference 16.0%, 95% CI -0.7-32.7, P= 0.07). Of patients followed up, 13/47 (27.7%) and 20/49 (40.8%) had ongoing nausea respectively (difference 13.2%, 95% CI -7.7-34.0, P= 0.25). The tropisetron group had less akathisia.Tropisetron was associated with a significantly lower vomiting rate and shows promise as an alternative anti-emetic in the ED.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAntiemetics.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherDouble-Blind Methoden
dc.subject.otherEmergency Medical Services.methodsen
dc.subject.otherEmergency Service, Hospitalen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIncidenceen
dc.subject.otherIndoles.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMetoclopramide.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherNausea.drug therapyen
dc.subject.otherVomiting.drug therapy.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherYoung Adulten
dc.titleTropisetron versus metoclopramide for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in the emergency department: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleEmergency Medicine Australasia : EMAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01444.xen
dc.description.pages554-61en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21995469en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherFrauman, Albert G
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.