Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11203
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Morgan, G M | en |
dc.contributor.author | McKenzie, Ian F C | en |
dc.contributor.author | Melvold, R W | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-16T00:47:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-16T00:47:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1978-12-01 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Immunogenetics; 7(1): 247-58 | en |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 21302079 | en |
dc.identifier.other | PUBMED | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11203 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The mouse strain B10.D2-H-2(da) carries the mutantH-2(da) allele, derived after chemical induction, and this has been shown to be a gain and loss mutation involving theH-2D(d) locus.BALB/c- H-2(db), derived spontaneously, is a loss mutation only, and appears not to involve theH-2D(d), but rather theH-2L(d) locus. The two mutations effectboth graft rejection and serologically detected H-2 specificities (Type II mutation). In the experiments described in this study, theloss mutations in theH-2(da) andH-2(db) mutants have been compared by skin grafting, and by direct and absorption serological techniques: (1) By skin grafting, using the well established complementation method, it has been shown thatH-2(da) andH-2(db) do not complement each other, i.e., the mutation in both occurred at the same 'locus.' However, by appropriate selection of donor and recipient, it has become clear thatH-2(da) had a greater loss than didH-2(db), althoughH-2(da) includes the loss found inH-2(db). (2) Serological studies have demonstrated that H-2D.4 was altered inH-2(da), but not inH-2(db); 'H-2.28' (detected by D-28b and D-29) was decreased or lost in both mutants;H-2(db) anti-BALB/c failed to react withH-2(da); both mutants reacted similarly with D-28 sera. In addition, sera made usingH-2(da) as donor did not contain an anti-H 2.28 antibody. The loss mutation involvingH-2(da) therefore appears to have led also to the loss of H-2.28 as found inH-2(db). We conclude that theH-2(da) strain arose after a complex mutation or recombination event which involvedboth theH-2D(d) locus and the closely linkedH-2L(d) locus, whereasH-2(db) affects only theH-2L locus. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | The relationship between theH-2 loss mutations ofH-2(da) andH-2 (db) in the mouse. | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Immunogenetics | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Medicine, Austin Hospital, 3084, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/BF01844012 | en |
dc.description.pages | 247-58 | en |
dc.relation.url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21302079 | en |
dc.type.austin | Journal Article | en |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.