Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10957
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Philip A R-
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Ian R-
dc.contributor.authorHare, David L-
dc.contributor.authorMatalanis, George-
dc.contributor.authorHorrigan, Mark L-
dc.contributor.authorRosalion, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, Brian F-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:32:07Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:32:07Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery; 139(1): 60-5; discussion 65-7en
dc.identifier.govdoc20106358en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10957en
dc.description.abstractTo investigate the optimum conduit for coronary targets other than the left anterior descending artery, we evaluated long-term patencies and clinical outcomes of the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, and saphenous vein through the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.As part of a 10-year prospective, randomized, single-center trial, patients undergoing primary coronary surgery were allocated to the radial artery (n = 198) or free right internal thoracic artery (n = 196) if aged less than 70 years (group 1), or radial artery (n = 113) or saphenous vein (n = 112) if aged at least 70 years (group 2). All patients received a left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending, and the randomized conduit was used to graft the second largest target. Protocol-directed angiography has been performed at randomly assigned intervals, weighted toward the end of the study period. Grafts are defined as failed if there was occlusion, string sign, or greater than 80% stenosis, independently reported by 3 assessors. Analysis is by intention to treat.At mean follow up of 5.5 years, protocol angiography has been performed in groups 1 and 2 in 237 and 113 patients, respectively. There are no significant differences within each group in preoperative comorbidity, age, or urgency. Patencies were similar for either of the 2 conduits in each group (log rank analysis, P = .06 and P = .54, respectively). The differences in estimated 5-year patencies were 6.6% (radial minus right internal thoracic artery) in group 1 and 2.9% (radial minus saphenous vein graft) in group 2.At mean 5-year angiography in largely asymptomatic patients, the selection of arterial or venous conduit for the second graft has not significantly affected patency. This finding offers surgeons, for now, enhanced flexibility in planning revascularization.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Artery Bypassen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMammary Arteries.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherRadial Artery.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherSaphenous Vein.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherVascular Patencyen
dc.titleComparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, the Statistical Consulting Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043en
dc.description.pages60-5; discussion 65-7en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9554-6556-
dc.identifier.pubmedid20106358-
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBuxton, Brian F
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

84
checked on Mar 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.