Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10874
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David McDen
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Jeffreyen
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Dawsonen
dc.contributor.authorMacBean, Catherine Een
dc.contributor.authorBraitberg, Georgeen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:27:07Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2009-08-01en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health; 33(4): 388-94en
dc.identifier.govdoc19689602en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10874en
dc.description.abstractTo compare the nature of therapeutic errors made by adults in community residential units (CRU) and private homes (Home).This was an analytical case series of therapeutic errors, involving adults, reported to the Victorian Poisons Information Centre (January 2006 to March 2007). The main outcome measures were the nature, causes and outcomes of the errors and actions taken or recommendations for avoidance.Ninety-seven CRU and 611 Home residents (cases) were enrolled. These groups took 243 (median 2) and 785 (median 1) medications in error, respectively (p<0.001). The medication administrators were predominately staff members (94.8%) and the cases themselves (95.9%), respectively (p<0.001). The CRU cases more frequently had an incorrect medication(s) or another person's medication(s) and the Home cases a double dose or incorrect dose (p<0.001). Wide ranges of medications were taken in error with cardiac and respiratory medications being more common among the Home cases. Four (4.1%, 95% CI 1.3-10.8) CRU and 16 (2.6%, 95% CI 1.6-4.3) Home cases were referred to hospital. No case followed up had a serious outcome. Error cause differed significantly between the groups (p<0.001). Staffing issues and human factors were common within the CRU and Home groups, respectively.Therapeutic errors in the community are preventable and differ considerably between the CRU and Home settings.Prevention initiatives are indicated with particular attention to CRU staffing, training and procedural issues.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherChi-Square Distributionen
dc.subject.otherCommunity Health Servicesen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHome Nursingen
dc.subject.otherHomes for the Ageden
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMedication Errors.prevention & control.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherNursing Homesen
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen
dc.subject.otherRisk Factorsen
dc.subject.otherSelf Administrationen
dc.subject.otherStatistics, Nonparametricen
dc.titleTherapeutic errors involving adults in the community setting: nature, causes and outcomes.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian and New Zealand journal of public healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Victoria.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00413.xen
dc.description.pages388-94en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19689602en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Feb 5, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.