Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10395
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarlis, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorHorrigan, Mark C Gen
dc.contributor.authorElis, Safarien
dc.contributor.authorChan, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorWong, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorFarouque, Omaren
dc.contributor.authorProimos, Georgeen
dc.contributor.authorAjani, Andrew Een
dc.contributor.authorClark, David Jen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:49:57Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2007-04-06en
dc.identifier.citationCardiovascular Revascularization Medicine : Including Molecular Interventions; 8(2): 84-9en
dc.identifier.govdoc17574165en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10395en
dc.description.abstractPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for high-grade stenosis of the left main coronary artery with bare-metal stents has been limited by restenosis, and most patients are managed with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Recently, drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced instent restenosis after PCI, but their role in the treatment of left main disease remains unclear.The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes after utilizing DES to treat left main disease.Twenty consecutive symptomatic patients with >50% angiographic stenosis of the left main coronary artery with no prior history of CABG ["unprotected left main" (ULM)] underwent PCI with DES. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (Group A, n=5) or absence (Group B, n=15) of preprocedural cardiogenic shock. At follow up (median, 14 months), cumulative major adverse cardiac events (MACE-death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) were determined.Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients were at high risk for CABG because of comorbidity, advanced age, or cardiogenic shock. Procedural success was 100% (20/20). Three of five patients in Group A (60%) died in hospital and the two surviving patients experienced no MACE at follow up. In Group B (n=15), there was no in-hospital MACE, but one patient died suddenly 8 weeks postprocedure [cumulative MACE of 7% (1/15)].Our study demonstrates the feasibility of ULM treatment with DES with acceptable medium-term outcomes. While CABG remains the best form of revascularization for the majority of patients with ULM, DES should be considered in those who are at high risk.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherAngioplasty, Balloon, Coronary.adverse effects.instrumentationen
dc.subject.otherCardiovascular Agents.administration & dosageen
dc.subject.otherCardiovascular Diseases.etiology.mortalityen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Artery Bypass.adverse effectsen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Stenosis.mortality.radiography.surgery.therapyen
dc.subject.otherFeasibility Studiesen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherPatient Selectionen
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherProsthesis Designen
dc.subject.otherResearch Designen
dc.subject.otherRisk Assessmenten
dc.subject.otherSeverity of Illness Indexen
dc.subject.otherShock, Cardiogenic.etiology.mortalityen
dc.subject.otherStentsen
dc.subject.otherTime Factorsen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleTreatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents in patients at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventionsen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3084, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.carrev.2006.11.007en
dc.description.pages84-9en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17574165en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherClark, David J
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptUniversity of Melbourne Clinical School-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.