Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9625
Title: A comparison between M.R.I. and C.T. in acute spinal trauma.
Austin Authors: Silberstein, M;Tress, B M;Hennessy, O F
Affiliation: Department of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 1-Aug-1992
Publication information: Australasian Radiology; 36(3): 192-7
Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 0.3T and Computed Tomography (CT) were compared in the retrospective evaluation of 34 patients with acute spinal cord injury. MRI was highly accurate in the imaging of vertebral body fracture, and spondylitic changes, and is the method of choice for imaging ligament injury, traumatic disc protrusion and spinal cord compression. It was also useful for the identification of subtle subluxations in the sagittal plane. CT remains the method of choice for imaging neural arch fractures. MRI at 0.3T is a valid technique for assessing patients with acute spinal trauma.
Gov't Doc #: 1445100
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9625
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1445100
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Dislocations.diagnosis.radiography
Edema.diagnosis.radiography
Female
Humans
Ligaments.injuries.pathology.radiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging.methods
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Cord Compression.diagnosis.radiography
Spinal Cord Injuries.diagnosis.radiography
Spinal Fractures.diagnosis.radiography
Spinal Injuries.diagnosis.radiography
Spinal Osteophytosis.diagnosis.radiography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed.methods
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.