Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26239
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoecke, James D-
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Cindy-
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Christopher J-
dc.contributor.authorStoops, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorBourgeat, Pierrick-
dc.contributor.authorRainey-Smith, Stephanie R-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Qiao-Xin-
dc.contributor.authorMasters, Colin L-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Ralph N-
dc.contributor.authorVillemagne, Victor L-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Steven J-
dc.contributor.authorVanderstichele, Hugo Marcel-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T05:58:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-19T05:58:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-16-
dc.identifier.citationAlzheimer's Research & Therapy 2021; 13(1):79en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26239-
dc.description.abstractCSF biomarkers are well-established for routine clinical use, yet a paucity of comparative assessment exists regarding CSF extraction methods during lumbar puncture. Here, we compare in detail biomarker profiles in CSF extracted using either gravity drip or aspiration. Biomarkers for β-amyloidopathy (Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40), tauopathy (total tau), or synapse pathology (BACE1, Neurogranin Trunc-p75, α-synuclein) were assessed between gravity or aspiration extraction methods in a sub-population of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study (cognitively normal, N = 36; mild cognitive impairment, N = 8; Alzheimer's disease, N = 6). High biomarker concordance between extraction methods was seen (concordance correlation > 0.85). Passing Bablock regression defined low beta coefficients indicating high scalability. Levels of these commonly assessed CSF biomarkers are not influenced by extraction method. Results of this study should be incorporated into new consensus guidelines for CSF collection, storage, and analysis of biomarkers.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen
dc.subjectAmyloid betaen
dc.subjectBiomarkersen
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluiden
dc.subjectCollectionen
dc.subjectConcordanceen
dc.titleCore Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarker assays are not affected by aspiration or gravity drip extraction methods.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAlzheimer's Research & Therapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationEdith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Alzheimer's Research Foundation, Perth, WA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationADx NeuroSciences, Ghent, Belgiumen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMolecular Imaging and Therapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationADx NeuroSciences, Ghent, Belgiumen
dc.identifier.affiliationBiomarkable, Ghent, Belgium.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13195-021-00812-9en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid33863377
local.name.researcherMasters, Colin L
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
crisitem.author.deptMolecular Imaging and Therapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
26239.pdf1.51 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Nov 28, 2024

Download(s)

78
checked on Nov 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.