Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23556
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChiodo-Reidy, Jessica-
dc.contributor.authorLoftus, Michael J-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Natasha E-
dc.date2020-06-15-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18T00:24:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-18T00:24:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.citationInternal medicine journal 2022-02; 52(2): 282-287-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23556-
dc.description.abstractEarly identification and treatment of serious infections improves clinical outcomes. Previous studies have found that septic patients without fever are more likely to die than those with fever, due to delay in antibiotic administration. To determine whether antibiotic treatment and mortality differed in afebrile adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with bacteraemia, compared with those with a history of fever. Retrospective six-month audit of all adult patients with positive blood cultures taken in the Emergency Department (ED) of a single tertiary hospital. Outcomes included receipt of antibiotics within 4 and 24 h of ED arrival, in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. 227 patients with clinically significant bacteraemia were identified, of which 38 (16.7%) were afebrile in ED. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of afebrile or febrile patients receiving antibiotics within 4-h (44.7% vs 55.6%, p = 0.222) or 24-h (89.5% vs 95.2%, p = 0.163) of arrival at ED. Inpatient mortality was not statistically different in the afebrile and febrile groups 15.8% vs 6.9%, p = 0.070), but 30-day mortality was higher among afebrile patients (27.6% vs 10.1%, p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in receipt of antibiotics within 4 h or 24 h ED arrival between the febrile and afebrile groups. However, afebrile patients experienced higher 30-day mortality. While most bacteraemic patients received antibiotics within 24 h, only half received antibiotics within 4 h, representing a key area for improvement. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectBacteremia-
dc.subjectCommunicable Diseases-
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine-
dc.subjectFever-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.titleNo Fever, No Worries? A Retrospective Audit of Bacteraemic Patients in the Emergency Department.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternal Medicine Journal-
dc.identifier.affiliationThe University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseases, Alfred Health-
dc.identifier.affiliationMercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imj.14938-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4412-6911en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6672-0578en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8501-4054-
dc.identifier.pubmedid32542931-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Feb 6, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.