Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22002
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeow, J-
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, M-
dc.contributor.authorWang, W-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, P-
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Mark D-
dc.date2019-10-30-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-06T04:04:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-06T04:04:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.citationClinical radiology 2020; 75(2): 88-99-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22002-
dc.description.abstractHepatic angiomyolipomas (HAMLs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms, which have highly variable imaging appearances, often leading to misdiagnosis. They belong to the family of perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas). HAMLs have a wide spectrum of imaging appearances due to variable amounts of smooth muscle cells, adipose tissue, and blood vessels in their makeup. Although typically sporadic, they are also associated with tuberous sclerosis. Sporadic lesions tend to be solitary whilst patients with tuberous sclerosis often have multiple HAMLs invariably accompanied by renal AMLs. Having been originally considered benign hamartomas, increasing reports of complications, including malignant behaviour, has also resulted in uncertainty in regard to their optimal management. Typically described imaging characteristics are of a hypervascular fat-containing lesion with prominent intratumoural vessels and an early draining vein; however HAMLs commonly demonstrate a paucity of fat or wash-out on contrast-enhanced imaging, and not all HAML lesions are hypervascular. HAMLs can therefore easily be misdiagnosed as other hepatic lesions, in particular hepatocellular carcinoma. This review describes the imaging characteristics of HAMLs, illustrating the wide variety of potential appearances across ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and highlights the challenges and potential errors that can be made. This review will aid radiologists in avoiding potentially major pitfalls when faced with this rare but important liver pathology.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleImaging hepatic angiomyolipomas: key features and avoiding errors.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleClinical radiology-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiology Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEpworth Medical Imaging, Geelong, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiology Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.135-
dc.identifier.pubmedid31677881-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
local.name.researcherGoodwin, Mark D
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptRadiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jan 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.