Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Carotid artery and cerebral blood flow during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review of the literature.
Austin Authors: Lucchetta, Luca;Kwan, Timothy N;Kosaka, Junko;Aiko, Tanaka;Eastwood, Glenn M ;Chan, Matthew;Martensson, Johan;May, Clive N;Bellomo, Rinaldo 
Affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Okayama Univerisyt, Okayama, Japan
Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne Australia
Issue Date: May-2019
Date: 2019-02-21
Publication information: Resuscitation 2019; 138: 46-52
Abstract: The carotid artery blood flow (CABF) or cerebral blood flow (CBF) achieved with current techniques of cardiac compression in humans are unknown. Animal experiments may provide useful information on such flows and on possible techniques to optimize them. To obtain an estimate of carotid and cerebral blood flows during cardiac compression with different techniques. We performed a systematic review of all studies in the English literature that measured the CABF and/or CBF during cardiac compression in experimental models of cardiac arrest, expressed as a percentage of baseline (pre-arrest) values. We compared the effect of vasopressor use, thoracic compression technique, pre-arrest infusion and animal model on maximum blood flows using standard statistical methodologies. Overall, 133 studies were reviewed. Of these, 45 studies provided information only on CABF; 77 only on CBF, and 11 studies on both flows. The overall weighted mean (±SD) CABF was 35.2 ± 27.7% of baseline. Porcine studies showed lower CABF when vasopressors were used (p = 0.0002). Studies of CBF reported a weighted mean value of 66.5 ± 48.5% of baseline. Adjunctive vasopressor therapy significantly increased CBF (p = 0.007), as did fluid administration (P = 0.049). In studies reporting both CABF and CBF, the median CABF/CBF ratio was 0.67 (range 0.21-1.96). During experimental cardiac compression, compared to baseline, CABF appears to decrease much more than CBF. However results should be regarded with caution. They are affected by ancillary interventions and measurement methods, variability is marked and, in experiments measuring CABF and CBF simultaneously, their ratios range well outside physiologically plausible values.
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.016
ORCID: 0000-0002-1650-8939
Journal: Resuscitation
PubMed URL: 30797862
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Cardiac arrest
Cardiac massa
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Carotid artery flow
Cerebral blood flow
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Apr 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.