Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19970
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKorman, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorDash, Ranjan K-
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Philip J-
dc.date2018-12-06-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-02T01:13:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-02T01:13:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of applied physiology 1985; online first: 6 December-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19970-
dc.description.abstractThe second gas effect (SGE) occurs when nitrous oxide enhances the uptake of volatile anesthetics administered simultaneously. Recent work shows that the SGE is greater in blood than in the gas phase, that this is due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch, that as mismatch increases, the SGE increases in blood but is diminished in the gas phase, and that these effects persist well into the period of nitrous oxide maintenance anesthesia. These modifications of the SGE are most pronounced with the low soluble agents in current use. We investigate further the effect of net gas volume loss during nitrous oxide uptake on low concentrations of other gases present using partial pressure solubility diagrams. The steady-state equations of gas exchange were solved assuming a log normal distribution of ventilation-perfusion ratios using Lebesgue-Stieltjes integration. It was shown that under these conditions, the classical partial pressure-solubility diagram must be modified, that for currently used volatile anesthetic agents the alveolar-arterial partial pressure difference is less than that predicted in the past, and that the alveolar-arterial partial pressure difference may even be reversed during uptake in the case of highly insoluble gases such as sulfur hexafluoride. Comparing this with the situation described previously for nitrogen in steady-state air breathing, we show that for nitrogen, the direction of the alveolar-arterial gradient is opposite to the direction of net gas volume movement. Although gas uptake with ventilation-perfusion inequality exceeding that when matching is optimal, is shown to be possible, it is less likely than alveolar-arterial partial pressure reversal.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAlveolar-arterial partial pressure gradient-
dc.subjectAnesthetic uptake-
dc.subjectMathematical modeling-
dc.subjectSecond gas effect-
dc.subjectVentilation-perfusion mismatch-
dc.titleThe effect of net gas volume changes on alveolar and arterial gas partial pressures in the presence of ventilation-perfusion mismatch.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)-
dc.identifier.affiliationBiomedical Engineering and Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, United Statesen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1152/japplphysiol.00689.2018-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30521424-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Sep 22, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.