Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19220
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Jason A-
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Aziz, Mohd-Hafiz-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Joshua S-
dc.contributor.authorDulhunty, Joel M-
dc.contributor.authorCotta, Menino O-
dc.contributor.authorMyburgh, John-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorLipman, Jeffrey-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T00:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-13T00:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-15-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2016; 194(6): 681-91-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19220-
dc.description.abstractOptimization of β-lactam antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients is an intervention that may improve outcomes in severe sepsis. In this individual patient data meta-analysis of critically ill patients with severe sepsis, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes of those treated with continuous versus intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics. We identified relevant randomized controlled trials comparing continuous versus intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. We assessed the quality of the studies according to four criteria. We combined individual patient data from studies and assessed data integrity for common baseline demographics and study endpoints, including hospital mortality censored at 3days and clinical cure. We then determined the pooled estimates of effect and investigated factors associated with hospital mortality in multivariable analysis. We identified three randomized controlled trials in which researchers recruited a total of 632 patients with severe sepsis. The two groups were well balanced in terms of age, sex, and illness severity. The rates of hospital mortality and clinical cure for the continuous versus intermittent infusion groups were 19.6% versus 26.3% (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.00; P = 0.045) and 55.4% versus 46.3% (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.40; P = 0.021), respectively. In a multivariable model, intermittent β-lactam administration, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of renal replacement therapy, and infection by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli were significantly associated with hospital mortality. Continuous β-lactam administration was not independently associated with clinical cure. Compared with intermittent dosing, administration of β-lactam antibiotics by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis is associated with decreased hospital mortality.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectantibiotic-
dc.subjectmeropenem-
dc.subjectpharmacodynamics-
dc.subjectpharmacokinetics-
dc.subjectpiperacillin-tazobactam-
dc.titleContinuous versus Intermittent β-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis. A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSt. George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Malaysiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRedcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCritical Care and Trauma Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationBurns, Trauma & Critical Care Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1164/rccm.201601-0024OC-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939-
dc.identifier.pubmedid26974879-
dc.type.austinComparative Study-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinMeta-Analysis-
dc.type.austinResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Feb 8, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.