Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18060
Title: What nurses involved in a Medical Emergency Teams consider the most vital areas of knowledge and skill when delivering care to the deteriorating ward patient. A nurse-oriented curriculum development project.
Austin Authors: Currey, Judy;Massey, Debbie;Allen, Josh;Jones, Daryl A 
Affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Aug-2018
Date: 2018
Publication information: Nurse education today 2018; 67: 77-82
Abstract: Critical care nurses have been involved in Rapid Response Teams since their inception, particularly in medically led RRTs, known as Medical Emergency Teams. It is assumed that critical care skills are required to escalate care for the deteriorating ward patient. However, evidence to support critical care nurses' involvement in METs is anecdotal. Currently, little is known about the educational requirements for nurses involved in RRT or METs. We aimed to identify and describe what nurses involved in a MET consider the most vital areas of knowledge and skill when delivering care to the deteriorating ward patient. An exploratory descriptive design was used and data was collected at a session of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Rapid Response Team (ANZICS-RRT) Conference held at The Gold Coast, Australia in July 2015. All conference delegates were eligible to take part. Conference delegates totalled 293; 194 nurses, 89 doctors and 10 allied health professionals. Data collection took place in three phases, over a 90-minute period. First, demographic data were collected from all participants at the start of data collection. These data were collected using paper-based surveys. Second, extended response surveys; that is, paper-based surveys that asked open-ended questions to elicit free text responses, were used to collect participants' individual responses to the question: "What are the specific theoretical knowledge, skills and behavioural attributes required in a curricula to prepare nurses to be high functioning members of a MET?" Demographic, educational and work characteristics were descriptively analysed using SPSS (version 22). Participants perceptions of what knowledge, skills and attributes are required for nurses to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration were thematically analysed. Participants were predominantly female (88.3%, n = 91) with 54.4% (n = 56) holding a Bachelor of Nursing. Participants had a median of 20 years (IQR 16) experience as RNs, and a median of 14 years (IQR 13) experience in critical care. Participants formed part of METs frequently, with nearly half the cohort seeing clinically deteriorating patients more than once per day (37.9%, n = 33) or daily (10%, n = 9). Thematic analysis of survey responses revealed four main themes desired in Rapid Response Team Curricula: Clinical Deterioration Theory, Clinical Deterioration Skills, Rapid Response System Governance, and Professionalism and Teamwork. We suggest that a curriculum that educates nurses on the specific requirements of assessing, managing and evaluating all aspects of clinical deterioration is now required.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18060
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.009
Journal: Nurse education today
PubMed URL: 29803014
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Clinical deterioration
Curriculum
Medical Emergency Teams
Rapid Response Systems
Rapid Response Teams
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.