Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Improving discharge care: the potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before-after pilot study.
Austin Authors: Cadilhac, Dominique A;Andrew, Nadine E;Stroil Salama, Enna;Hill, Kelvin;Middleton, Sandy;Horton, Eleanor;Meade, Ian;Kuhle, Sarah;Nelson, Mark R;Grimley, Rohan
Affiliation: Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre (QCPRRC), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Acute Stroke Unit, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Australia
Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Sunshine Coast Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Nambour, Australia
Queensland Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia
Issue Date: 4-Aug-2017 2017-08-04
Publication information: BMJ Open 2017; 7(8): e016010
Abstract: Provision of a discharge care plan and prevention therapies is often suboptimal. Our objective was to design and pilot test an interdisciplinary, organisational intervention to improve discharge care using stroke as the case study using a mixed-methods, controlled before-after observational study design. Acute care public hospitals in Queensland, Australia (n=15). The 15 hospitals were ranked against a benchmark based on a composite outcome of three discharge care processes. Clinicians from a 'top-ranked' hospital participated in a focus group to elicit their success factors. Two pilot hospitals then participated in the organisational intervention that was designed with experts and consumers. Hospital clinicians involved in discharge care for stroke and patients admitted with acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack. A four-stage, multifaceted organisational intervention that included data reviews, education and facilitated action planning. Three discharge processes collected in Queensland hospitals within the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry were used to select study hospitals: (1) discharge care plan; (2) antihypertensive medication prescription and (3) antiplatelet medication prescription (ischaemic events only). Primary measure: composite outcome. Secondary measures: individual adherence changes for each discharge process; sensitivity analyses. The performance outcomes were compared 3 months before the intervention (preintervention), 3 months postintervention and at 12 months (sustainability). Data from 1289 episodes of care from the two pilot hospitals were analysed. Improvements from preintervention adherence were: antiplatelet therapy (88%vs96%, p=0.02); antihypertensive prescription (61%vs79%, p<0.001); discharge planning (72%vs94%, p<0.001); composite outcome (73%vs89%, p<0.001). There was an insignificant decay effect over the 12-month sustainability period (composite outcome: 89% postintervention vs 85% sustainability period, p=0.08). Discharge care in hospitals may be effectively improved and sustained through a staged and peer-informed, organisational intervention. The intervention warrants further application and trialling on a larger scale.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016010
ORCID: 0000-0001-8162-682X
PubMed URL: 28780550
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: change management
clinical audit
quality in health care
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.