Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16875
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorWeinberg, Laurence-
dc.contributor.authorPearce, Brett-
dc.contributor.authorScurrah, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorStory, David A-
dc.contributor.authorPillai, Param-
dc.contributor.authorMcCall, Peter R-
dc.contributor.authorMcNicol, Larry P-
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Philip J-
dc.date2016-02-16-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T23:27:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-26T23:27:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017; 31(2): 343-351en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16875-
dc.description.abstractTo study agreement in cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (Systemic VRI) and stroke volume variation (SV variation) between the FloTrac/Vigileo at radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites, and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution, in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. A prospective observational study of 25 adult patients with liver failure. Radial and femoral arteries were cannulated with standardised FloTrac/Vigileo arterial transducer kits and a PAC was inserted. CI, SV variation and Systemic VRI were measured four times (30 min after induction of anesthesia, 30 min after portal vein clamping, 30 min after graft reperfusion, 30 min after commencement of bile duct anastomosis). The bias, precision, limits of agreement (LOA) and percentage errors were calculated using Bland-Altman statistics to compare measurements from radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites and PAC thermodilution. Neither radial nor femoral CI achieved acceptable agreement with PAC CI [radial to PAC bias (SD) 1.17 (1.49) L/min/m2, percentage error 64.40 %], [femoral to PAC bias (SD) -0.71 (1.81) L/min/m2, percentage error 74.20 %]. Agreement between radial and femoral sites for CI [mean difference (SD) -0.43 (1.51) L/min/m2, percentage error 70.40 %] and Systemic VRI [mean difference (SD) 0.03 (4.17) LOA ±8.17 mmHg min m2/L] were also unacceptable. Agreement in SV variation between radial and femoral measurement sites approached a clinically acceptable threshold [mean difference (SD) 0.68 (2.44) %), LOA ±4.78 %]. FloTrac/Vigileo CI cannot substitute for PAC thermodilution CI, regardless of measurement site. SV variation measurements may be interchangeable between radial and femoral sites for determining fluid responsiveness.en_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectCardiac outputen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectPrecisionen_US
dc.titleAgreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilutionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computingen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26884378en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10877-016-9840-xen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Apr 17, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.