Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16646
Title: | Does a single bout of resistance or aerobic exercise after insulin dose reduction modulate glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes? A randomised cross-over trial | Austin Authors: | Gordon, Brett A;Bird, Stephen R;MacIsaac, Richard J;Benson, Amanda C | Affiliation: | Discipline of Exercise Physiology, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia Endocrinology and Diabetes, St. Vincent's Hospital & University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Oct-2016 | Date: | 2016-02-10 | Publication information: | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2016; 19(10): 795-799 | Abstract: | OBJECTIVES: Regular exercise is advocated for individuals with type 2 diabetes, without fully understanding the acute (0-72h post-exercise) glycaemic response. This study assessed post-exercise glycaemic profiles of non-exercising individuals with insulin treated type 2 diabetes, following resistance and aerobic exercise. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over trial. METHODS: Fourteen individuals with insulin treated type 2 diabetes (9 males, 5 females) aged 58.1±7.1 years (HbA1c: 8.0±0.6%) were allocated to single sessions of resistance (six whole-body exercises, three sets, 8-10 repetitions, 70% 1RM) and aerobic (30min cycling, 60% VO2peak) exercise, 7-days apart, with the day prior to the first exercise day of each intervention being the control condition. Immediately prior to exercise, insulin dosage was halved and breakfast consumed. Continuous glucose monitoring was undertaken to determine area under the curve and glucose excursions. RESULTS: Blood glucose initially increased (0-2h) following both resistance and aerobic exercise (p<0.001), peaking at 12.3±3.4mmolL(-1) and 12.3±3.3mmolL(-1), respectively. Area under the glucose curve was not statistically different over any of the 24h periods (p=0.12), or different in response to resistance (222±41mmolL(-1)24h(-1)) or aerobic (211±40 mmolL(-1)24h(-1)) exercise (p=0.56). Incidence of hyperglycaemia did not differ between exercise modes (p=0.68). Hypoglycaemic events were identified in three and four participants following resistance and aerobic exercise respectively: these did not require treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic response is not different between exercise modes, although 50% insulin dose reduction prior to exercise impairs the expected improvement. A common clinical recommendation of 50% insulin dose reduction does not appear to cause adverse glycaemic events. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16646 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.01.004 | Journal: | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26906164 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Continuous glucose monitoring Exercise therapy Glucose Hyperglycemia Hypoglycemic agents Resistance training |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.